1. FRIST COMMENT

Posted at 3:34PM on Jul 10th 2007 by KK

2. FRIST COMMENT LOSERS!!

Posted at 3:35PM on Jul 10th 2007 by KK

3. what is tmz talking about

Posted at 3:38PM on Jul 10th 2007 by celebrity.web.net

4. I saw da pics on perezhilton.com they didnt show nudity or anything just the faces which were priceless!!!

Posted at 3:40PM on Jul 10th 2007 by momo_rbd

5. Seriously who cares about their private sex life. It's no one business what they are doing behind closed doors that's their own business. But on the other hand seems kinda fishy, I mean if I were famous and knew that the paps are EVERYWHERE i go with high profile lens cameras, I most certainly would make sure that EVERY window, door etc is shut, closed covered to make sure that i'm not seen, especially while i'm in the middle of gettin it on. Their dumb. The more I type I think they did it on purpose??? I mean what else gives you more publicity now a days than a few porn videos or pics???

Posted at 3:40PM on Jul 10th 2007 by deelicious692

6. whatever then maybe they should learn how to keep their jewels covered they were hoping someone would take their photos they must be running out of money LOLOLOLOLOLL

Posted at 3:41PM on Jul 10th 2007 by Lake Michigan

7. I don't think they needed more publicity. I don't think he should have to answer the questions and it is tacky for so called "news reporters" to even bring it up.

Posted at 3:44PM on Jul 10th 2007 by wed1984

8. I think Nick can do so much better!!!

Posted at 3:45PM on Jul 10th 2007 by Kat

9. Didn't they have sex outside in public??? It wasn't like they were doing it in a privacy of their own room. I would have been mortified if someone was taking pic of me making out with my husband in a hotel room, but if you're doing it in public that's a different story...it would have been my stupidity to let that happen. They are one sick couple and should be embarrassed. I bet his parents are disgusted and humiliated with their son.

Posted at 3:49PM on Jul 10th 2007 by amy d

10. i think it is a shame that you cannot even have sex nowadays without a pap climbing your garden walls or into a tree making photos of you! no matter which celebrity it is, certain areas should remain private!

Posted at 3:51PM on Jul 10th 2007 by go

11. glad they hit him with that. only shows how celebrities want you see how they think they should be petrayed in their light.... hope i didn't get lost writing that lol ; / but i'm sure you get the point

can't take the heat from the other end of the stick.

Posted at 4:01PM on Jul 10th 2007 by Glimmerdrive

12. My understanding was that it was their private hot tub off of their room at the private resort in mexico they were staying at they were not out in the wide open spaces.

Posted at 4:06PM on Jul 10th 2007 by ldh

13. I loved it.. It was a priceless interview.
It seems nick is MIA on that topic. Everyone knows about it.
Vanessa is bringing him down faster than the speed of light.
For someone who claims he did nothing wrong, he sure is avoiding the subject.
Which is a little bit immature. A real man would face his problems instead of running from them. His attorney can't stop the press from asking questions or the general public from posting their opinions.. HAHAHAHA

This event will follow him around for a while. I believe.
It has tarnished his good boy image.
Way to go nick. You made a excellent choice picking vanessa.
I bet all the bloggers his attorney sent threats to are loving this.

Posted at 4:13PM on Jul 10th 2007 by Freedom of speech

14. You’re right #2, & #8 the more the dodge the question, the more they look bad.

#9…..This man is a reporter and it is his job to ask questions. Not just sit there and listen to you babble on. He is supposed to ask the questions that we as the public would want to ask.

#12….this was not in private. It was in plain sight where children, other couples, and even the Gardner could have been passing by/through or working in that area, and just happened to look up and to the side. They don’t want to see that.

Invasion of privacy is when you are on the inside and someone comes on the premises, looks in your window, and then snaps your photo. It does not manner how much they paid for this villa for the weekend. Or your status in society.

If they were on the roof top and a helicopter pilot for police was following a car chase, and he was un aware that he may see this sight, photographed them (or on video) along with the vehicle, or even alone, then again…no.

That is not an invasion of privacy. That is in plain sight where even people in the sky, that weren’t even looking for you, actually saw you, without knowing you were there.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jul 10th 2007 by Ricky

15. Hey KK ~ If you're gonna be a jerk off and think you are special cuz you're first...at least know how to spell FIRST! LMFAO

I wanna the pics!!! Find 'em TMZA and enlighten us 'Observers'!!!!

Posted at 4:34PM on Jul 10th 2007 by Idiot Observer