Promoter Up Sh*t Creek Without Kelly Contract

Who cares about this has been.............if you need to find him, check the local pre-school

Thank you, Mr. Radar. I reviewed the complaint and it appears that you have a strong case. Having remitted 25K, the defendants should be hard pressed to deny the existence of an agreement. Shame on TMZ for declaring it a legal loser before checking the law. Couldn't they give a ring to their own legal department (which, given the content on this site, is surely extensive)?

Janet had her Rhythm Nation.
I've got my Uri Nation!

Click on Richkiss.com if you want to infect your computer witha virus

#12, 15, 17 - Radar, Esq & DBK - 2 legal eagles swapping law briefs on TMZ! LMAO! Shouldn't you guys be taking this up somewhere else? Like a COURTROOM!?

I'm just a bored lawyer addicted to celebrity gossip, and thought it might be interesting to add some content to the blogs. I have no idea what post #20 is talking about; it’s complete gibberish. Apologies for the legal language--here it is in layman's terms (contract law 101):

1) A contract is just a fancy term for a legally enforceable agreement between parties. As long as the requirements for a contract are met (fn1), the law generally does NOT require that contracts be in writing in order for them to be enforceable (that’s why you often hear the term, “oral contract”). State laws set out what kinds of agreements have to be in writing (for example, contracts for the sale of real estate commonly must be in writing.). Such laws are called “Statutes of Frauds” because they are designed to prevent a random person from lying and saying that he entered into an agreement with another party. The contract at issue here is not of the type that is normally included in states’ Statutes of Frauds, so the fact that the contract wasn’t signed doesn’t prevent the plaintiff in this case from enforcing the agreement

2) Even if the contract at issue is covered by the “Statute of Frauds,” state law recognizes certain exceptions to the Statute. One exception is that if either party does everything he promised to do, the Statute of Frauds doesn’t apply. In this case, the plaintiff (Trevana Entertainment) did everything that the defendant (“Rowe Entertainment”) hired it to do: Trevana promoted and produced tours for R.Kelly. According to the complaint, these responsibilities included “coordination of all live, in-concert performances by R. Kelly during the course of the tour, including arranging performance dates, the negotiating of financial terms with concert venues,” etc. Accordingly, the fact that the contract wasn’t signed does not mean that there was no enforceable contract.

3) The law also carves out, in certain situations, remedies where there is NO contract. This is called “quasi contract.” One kind of “quasi contract” is called promissory estoppel (PE). PE requires only the following: (1) A makes a promise to B (e.g., A tells B she will hire him to paint her house, but they never actually reach an agreement); (2) A expects (or should expect) that B will rely on its promise in some way; (3) B relies on A’s promise in some way (e.g., B goes out and buys a bunch of paint); (4) “injustice,” meaning it just sucks that B went out and spent all that money on paint.

fn 1. The law requires the following to show that a contract exists (1) one party ("A") makes an offer inviting another party ("B") to enter into an agreement; (2) B accepts A's offer; and (3) there is "consideration” for the agreement, meaning that the agreement either benefits A (for example, if A hires B to build him a house, A gets the benefit of the house) or requires B to do something or agree not to do something.

He is a tuff chit man! Many friends I met on a dating site called meetingwealthy think so too. They are successful mena nd women. We usually talk togehter.

#25, I believe it's spelled "subpoena", NOT subpenaned. Another non-law abiding citizen obtaining a law degree in prison. How cute.

Who cares? Leave it in the ghetto.

#25 is now #23. Blogs keep disappearing on this site. Guess we have to adress by post name rather than #, huh??