Gwyneth Paltrow: Jacko 2.0?
If only Moses could part the pap sea, his mama wouldn't have to go to extremes to keep him under wraps.
Gwyneth Paltrow tried to block her oddly-named kids' faces in NY yesterday -- and they were not pleased.
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 2) | 1 | 2 |1. leave her alone...go bother Bret....she si just trying to live a normal life and you all are trying to make her out as a freak...get over yourselves!
Posted at 9:49PM on Apr 10th 2008 by whatever you say
2. who cares about her or her kids.
Posted at 6:19PM on Apr 10th 2008 by sheesh
3. Kids should be off limits. What did they follow them home after shopping? Pathetic.
Cute kids by the way.
Posted at 6:32PM on Apr 10th 2008 by Kelli
4. She actually made it harder on herself. What an idiot! Leave her and her kids alone, who cares!
Posted at 7:33PM on Apr 10th 2008 by scarlett
5. Go Back To England Gwyneth! We're too patriotic here, remember? And take Raspberry and Pear with you.
Posted at 7:36PM on Apr 10th 2008 by Pink to the Lee
6. Can you blame her for hiding her kids faces? Can you blame Jackson? A law should be made to make it illegal to photo the kids without parents permission!
Posted at 8:05PM on Apr 10th 2008 by Chris
7. I guess the old rule about leaving the kids alone has fallen by the wayside. Not good, there's a lot of nuts out there, and kidnapping is a real threat for these celebrity kids. Leave the kids out of it!
Posted at 7:51PM on Apr 10th 2008 by Mama Says
8. Gwyneth your kids are cute!
Posted at 8:05PM on Apr 10th 2008 by Sultry
9. Do you want to write about screwed up kids from famous parents in a decade or so? If not, leave the kids alone. You're not helping families who are already under a lot of pressure. Those kids deserve a chance to be kids that the constant barrage of photogs won't allow them. You should be ashamed.
Posted at 11:13PM on Apr 10th 2008 by anonymous
10. Her kids are adorable, I commend her for trying to protect them.
Posted at 8:45AM on Apr 11th 2008 by delois
11.
How stupid. I think it is disgusting to put something like that over your child's head just because someone might see them. What must that do to the children? I guess she is taking lessons from Michael Jackson, another nut job celebrity.
I think Paltro is a legend in her own mind.
Posted at 9:47AM on Apr 11th 2008 by RuthD
12. guys remember - she only SELLS her kids photos for moola $ -- a la People Magazine spread. no free pics -- so greedy, so ridiculous.
Posted at 10:19AM on Apr 11th 2008 by ridic
13. and btw, why is she suddenly on the press/publicity circuit? she must be in need of an ego boost.
Posted at 10:20AM on Apr 11th 2008 by ridic
14. I don't like Ms. Paltrow - since she had her first baby and was going on and on about how can women work after having babies, they need to stay home and care for their children...excuse me miss thing, we were not all born with a golden spoon in our mouth to allow us to do that unlike yourself. Having said that, I can understand wanting to hide her children, not necessarily from being photographed, but all those flashes right in their faces cannot be good for their eyes, and probably scares them having all those people crowd and crush them.
Posted at 10:41AM on Apr 11th 2008 by rock on
15. Why the hell is she dragging these kids around when she doesn't want them to be seen.
Buy a nice ranch and get the hell away from the lens!
wtf is wrong wirh these people
Posted at 4:20PM on Apr 12th 2008 by TorontoPerezfFan
