Suspect Confession in Hudson Case?

1. ok so why didn't he mention Julia's name? cause she is obviously involved.

Posted at 2:38PM on Nov 9th 2008 by spermkidz

2. Are they knocking on Julia's door yet, to arrest her? Please people don't dare write on here that she knew nothing about this, if you do you are just kidding yourself. What a shame...

Posted at 2:44PM on Nov 9th 2008 by KnewIT

3. Something is not right here. This guy is due to be released on Monday due to lack of evidence, and then all of a sudden with no additional evidence, he confesses??????? NO-NO-NO-, it appears that this guy had no attorney and either he was beaten into making this confession, or something else is happening here. SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT????

Why have the police not questioned Julia Hudson, for it is 100% apparent that if this guy was mixed up in those killings, you can bet your but, that Julia was the second person and he was protecting her.

Why is the police keeping Julia name on the down low!!!! I hope this is not a case of being paid off to keep quite, and let a guildty preson go free.

People something is wrong here and if Belfour mothers stands by and let this happen........something is wrong!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 3:02PM on Nov 9th 2008 by shocked22

4. shocked22 - You're an idiot and really need to REread the article. Balfour told his girlfriend before he was arrested - you obviously have not followed this case very closely. Please stop spewing your ignorance.

Posted at 3:03PM on Nov 9th 2008 by Okie Doke

5. Well now it's only a matter of time before they are knocking on Julia's door....

Posted at 3:06PM on Nov 9th 2008 by Gemini

6. Sounds like he said he had 'something' to with it, was at the house.. how come she didnt' say that he told her he killed them then? Still sounds like this wasn't just him. Hope we get more of the story soon.

Posted at 3:14PM on Nov 9th 2008 by questions questions

7. Confessing to anybody means nothing more than Balfour could be just plain stupid. Brains aren't for everybody.

Posted at 3:20PM on Nov 9th 2008 by JRN

8. these are Obama peeps, release them, Right Now----The One That We've Been Waiting For

Posted at 3:20PM on Nov 9th 2008 by Stop the hate

9. Ok. This is confusing. If they recovered the gun, whose fingerprints were on the gun. What was the time frame of the Hudson's murders. Was the nephew killed on the same day, or was he killed after Balfour was arrested. Julia, can they validate her whereabouts when the murders occurred. There is something fishy about this whole story. Technology is too far advanced for them not to have a solid lead to who the killer or killers are. So, I question the Chicago police department. What are you not telling the public? As citizens, we have the right to know the truth. Thank you.

Posted at 3:28PM on Nov 9th 2008 by ldc

10. I thought this fine gentlement was pitching woo with more than one delicate lass.

Posted at 3:32PM on Nov 9th 2008 by Tangina

11. they really wanted to have something on him to hold him on monday. i knew it was coming because they couldn't let him go, he's the only suspect, they had to find something before monday and they did, so they'll still have him in jail untill they finish the investigations. william balfour, you'r not going anywhere.lol if u did, u'll pay, if not, u'll get out just confess!!!!

Posted at 7:30PM on Nov 9th 2008 by rosie

12. TMZ lifted the story from the Chicago Tribune website. here is the timeline. Also I did read somewhere tha Julia was at work all day on the day of the killings.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-jennifer-hudson-murders-timeline,0,3065797.story

Posted at 3:40PM on Nov 9th 2008 by dana

13. Remember folks, these are CHICAGO police we are talking about! I hear it's very easy to buy them off. It's been like that since the 1920's.

Posted at 3:45PM on Nov 9th 2008 by Mitzi

14. OLD NEWS TMZ.

THIS WAS REPORTED NOT LONG AFTER WILLIAM WAS PICKED UP.

GET WITH THE TIMES.

SERIOUSLY

Posted at 3:59PM on Nov 9th 2008 by OLD NEWS

15. 1. ok so why didn't he mention Julia's name? cause she is obviously involved.
Posted at 2:38PM on Nov 9th 2008 by spermkidz

if you are so SURE about this, perhaps you should contact the police yourself, you could probably save them sometime and man power!
_____________________________________________
6. Sounds like he said he had 'something' to with it, was at the house.. how come she didnt' say that he told her he killed them then?
Posted at 3:14PM on Nov 9th 2008 by questions questions

William Balfour -- the only suspect in the Hudson triple murder case -- allegedly told his current girlfriend he was involved in the murders of Hudson's mother and brother, according to sources at the Chicago Tribune.
Balfour's girlfriend in turn told police what he told her.
_______________________________________
9. Julia, can they validate her whereabouts when the murders occurred. There is something fishy about this whole story. Technology is too far advanced for them not to have a solid lead to who the killer or killers are. So, I question the Chicago police department. What are you not telling the public? As citizens, we have the right to know the truth. Thank you.
Posted at 3:28PM on Nov 9th 2008 by ldc

like it was reported weeks ago, julia has an alibi. she was at work.
i'm sure there are alot of things they are not telling the public, it's an investigation!!!!!....but talk to #1 they seem to know everything

Posted at 4:02PM on Nov 9th 2008 by good_golly_will_a_kers