Celebrity Justice
Vince Young: My Name Was Straight Jacked

Tennessee Titan Vince Young is doing whatever he can to get his mojo back this year -- he says someone else stole his nickname "In-vince-able" and his initials "VY" two years ago, and he wants 'em back.


Young claims in a Federal lawsuit three dudes from deep in the heart of Texas applied for the trademark for "VY" and "INVINCEABLE" the day after he won the Rose Bowl back in 2006 -- locking up the rights.

Now, young's lawyer tells us, the football star can't get deals with Reebok and video game makers, among others, because the defendants won't give up their claim to "VY" or "INVINCEABLE."

Weird sports trivia fact: According to Vince's attorney, one of the defendants is Enos Cabell, who played third base for the Houston Astros back in the '70s. We're still waiting for some calls back from the people getting sued.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 2) | 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. You snooze you lose. Should have obtained your trademark before someone else.

Posted at 3:26PM on Dec 16th 2008 by :[

2. Find whoever stole your game and sue to get that back.

Posted at 3:27PM on Dec 16th 2008 by ELK

3. Free enterprise! How the hell does he expect to win this suit..........unless he "trademarked" his name, it is a frivolous suit!

Posted at 3:48PM on Dec 16th 2008 by lls

4. Vince Young was already on the cover of Madden, so he won't be doing another video game anytime soon. And those 3 guys are brilliant.

Posted at 5:53PM on Dec 16th 2008 by thun

5. You really think a college junior was thinking about trademarking at that point in his life? At that point he was still planning on staying in school.

Posted at 5:21PM on Dec 16th 2008 by Ryan

6. He hardly deserves a special notation to his name. He is a 3rd player who has yet to prove himself. Maybe he should spent less time worry about such trivial matters and work on improving his game.

Posted at 5:24PM on Dec 16th 2008 by Brien

7. He's not getting deals from Reebok and etc; not because someone copyrighted his nicknames but because he sucks as a professional football. If I were him, I would concentrate on his football skills and not waste time on some dumbass nicknames.....get your priorities straight, dude

Posted at 6:21PM on Dec 16th 2008 by tba

8. Appears that a couple capitalists beat him to the spot... just as NFL cornerbacks do.

Posted at 8:50PM on Dec 16th 2008 by Arealrascal

9. uhhh...Hey Patron Dummy.....what about all the milions of "Normal" people that have the same initials as you . Will you speak up for the too? Why dont you complain to Stan Lee about " The Invincibe IRONMAN"? ...your just another idiot with a chip on your shoulders that is trying to use the system for your gain. You are not special and you are no IRONMAN....you are CRYBABY MAN.Just ask yo Momma. How can a man that is almost 40yrs take your job this year . You need to go to the CFL

Posted at 12:00AM on Dec 17th 2008 by RAY RAY Z AND THE MASONRY

10. sorry all my fans...but I type way too fast for my mind...sorry for the typo's . ENOS CABELL.....YEAHHH...AN EX DODGER TOO

Posted at 12:09AM on Dec 17th 2008 by RAY RAY Z AND THE MASONRY

11. Your added comments are brutal, I have never been so upset over an article you have written, you lost a advent fan over this. Next time, if you even care, Try to be a little more impartial. Untill you walk a mile in his shoes, you have no idea.

Posted at 12:40AM on Dec 17th 2008 by JenE

12. HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHA!

Posted at 4:43AM on Dec 17th 2008 by Jesus Christall

13. Just come up with another nickname. Many people have more than one.

Posted at 6:07PM on Dec 17th 2008 by Rita

14. JenE - an "advent fan"? You're only a fan during the Christmas season? Cool.

Posted at 1:51PM on Dec 17th 2008 by Phil Dirt

15. All who are complaining about VY's "complaint" should read the pleadings. The joint venture participants gave sworn, notarized statements that they did not own any of the "VY", "Invinceable", or other logos sought to be marketed at the time of their application filings. Further, they had previously given sworn statements that they had no bona fide intent to use the marks or logos in commerce as required under the Lanham Act. Nothing like being hanged with your own rope!!

Posted at 3:44PM on Dec 17th 2008 by LearnedCounsel

| 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments