She's Responsible for the "Twilight" Zone

Inspired by a dream she had, Stephenie Meyer only wrote the "Twilight" books, not the nightmare that was the cheesy film adaptation.

Stephenie Meyer
The 35-year-old new J.K. Rowling arrived in Vancouver to do some more press for her teen vampire series.

Wonder if awkward closeups, long pauses and bad acting were in her original draft?



Tags: author, book, Mormon, Stephenie Meyer, StephenieMeyer, Twilight

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 7) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. This chick is a bag of bones!!! Eat a Cheese Burger already....oh ya....

Posted at 1:02PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Whamo

2. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Yeah....that movie was AWFUL!!!!

Posted at 1:01PM on Feb 25th 2009 by sue

3. It was a honner to have her write about me.

Posted at 1:04PM on Feb 25th 2009 by DOA

4. I personally loved the Twilight saga,and I am far from being a teenager anymore,granted the director could have done a better job with the movie,hopefully Chris Weitz will do a better job with New Moon.As far as Rob Pattinson goes he is gorgeous and they couldnt have picked anyone to better portray Edward.

Posted at 1:08PM on Feb 25th 2009 by xThatOneGirlx

5. Stephanie Meyer may be a best selling author, and the movie did pretty good.

She's doing very well for herself, but she is no J.K. Rowling. The Harry Potter series sold 400+ million copies. The Twilight books have sold 40+ million. Not even close.

Posted at 1:10PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Not Quite.

6. Stephanie Meyer's is seeing her dreams coming to life on screen. I agree Twilight could have been better but she should have stepped in and not let them change it. It was supposed to be a Romeo & Juliet love story (the way the book was written) but it was lacking the diehard love. I loved the books and i am not a teenager. The reason why Harry Potter did so well was because there are so many more books. Who knows maybe she would think about going back and continuing the story, we can only hope. As far as what she looks like, she is a freaking writer not a model or even an actor.

Posted at 1:15PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Ana73

7. "Wonder if awkward closeups, long pauses and bad acting were in her original draft?"

ROFL, Exactly!!!

Posted at 1:15PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Kale

8. Twilight was great when you consider the idea that most of the "meat" was written in thought, not action. Kristin and Robert did an amazing job of bringing the spirit of the book to life....I am far too old to be a teen, and my kids too young to be a twi-mom....I am just someone who is greatful that there is something more than sex and 90210 for my daughter to look forward to in her tween years. Stephenie did an amazing job in writing these books...and "WHAMO" real women have curves, and should happily flaunt them....Not try to impress some sofa riding fat guy whith a cheeseburger in one hand and a remote in the other.

Posted at 1:24PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Get over yourself

9. Was ripped off...by hollywood.The real writer still has her first versons which sony/fox made go away.She was`nt a show boat and din`t fit into hollywoods vison so they buryed her under 500 lawers and 10,000 feet of paper.

Posted at 1:24PM on Feb 25th 2009 by hairy pottier

10. That entire serious was so stupid I can't even describe it. The plot was absolutely ridiculous.

Posted at 3:26PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Alize

11. No, the reason Harry Potter did better is because they're better books.

If you want to work with averages...

Twilight Books:
40 million copies of four books = 10 million copies per book.

Harry Potter books:
400 million copies of seven books = 57+ million copies per book

Not the same. I can't imagine any author being able to top the stats for RK Rowling. The last book sold 11 million copies...in 24 hours.

Posted at 1:27PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Not Quite.

12. OMG..JK fans...GET OVER IT. HARRY POTTER is dead. And there were seven books, btw, while there were only four Twilight books.
And while I do argee that the Twilight movie had awkward closeups and pauses, the acting was awesome. The two stars carried that movie and kept it from being lame and cheesy.
If you want to see bad acting, check out a Harry Potter film.

Posted at 1:56PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Courtney

13. The books were great, and the movie, like always, didn't live up to her skill and imagination. Well done Stephanie.

Posted at 1:54PM on Feb 25th 2009 by allieb

14. did she eat Fran Drescher?

Posted at 1:56PM on Feb 25th 2009 by adrienne

15. Yea Courtney up there must have the rock pretty hard this morning, of course the acting in twilight was horrible! I took the wife to see it, as she had been reading the books................I wanted a bottle of advil, straight razor and vodka............u know...............to kill my self...................the vodka and advil was for the pain of watching the movie...........not the wrist cutting I wanted to do!

Posted at 2:13PM on Feb 25th 2009 by Steve

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments