TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Octomom Offered Free Porn Star Nannies

3/23/2009 7:45 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

Just try to imagine Octomom Nadya Suleman's kids doing Gerber body shots off porn stars -- and you have Vivid Entertainment's new million dollar offer for an Octo reality show.

launch docs

In a letter sent to Nadya, Vivid is offering her seven figures, free health insurance for one year and a bus big enough for the family if she agrees to do a reality show for them. The catch? All her nannies have to be porn stars and she has to appear semi-nude in a XXX flick.

We're pretty sure she'll say no -- but Octo just said she fired her Angels in Waiting nannies, so who knows?

127 COMMENTS

No Avatar
106.

Ticked Off Taxpayer    

I am tired of this person wasting my tax dollars, directly (WELFARE & FOOD STAMPS) or indirectly AIW. Who gave her the right? She has not earned it. She thinks she is entitled. Uh, no. America is the land of opportunity, not opportunists. Her whole clan (mother and father) are in on this big fleecing! No one finds it interesting that her mother stopped paying for the last house around the same time Octofraud was implanted with the litter? They (Octofraud, Octogranny and the 6 original children) trash that house and then walk away, washing their hands of the filthy mess THEY created. Uh, no, that's not how it works.

This Octofraud (and clan) needs to be held responsible for all the fraud they have commited. We need welfare reform now. This has got to stop or we will be seeing more of these huge births in the very near future....all paid for by the taxpayers. I, for one, am sick & tired of this. No more fame for fraud.

2017 days ago
107.

ruck    

ONLY GOD CAN FORGIVE OUR SINS, REPENT REPENT FOR THE COMING OF THE LORD IS AT HAND, JESUS IS COMING.

2017 days ago
108.

southsidechicago    

For #25 - "She fired them because they were there to witness every little thing she did wrong. They took notes and told her what needed to be done. Octopus did not want to hear it. Things like, you need to keep the older kids faces and hands out of the babies faces. You need to stay here and help take care of YOUR kids instead of running off shopping. Or you need to stop locking yourself up in your room for hours leaving everyone else to watch your kids. Nadaya doesn't want to be told how to spend HER money. They tell her to buy diapers and she goes out and buys clothes and makeup. That is just a few reasons she wants the all seeing eyes gone."

Posted at 5:29PM on Mar 23rd 2009 by Firefly
_________________________________________________________________________________

You are absolutely right. Nadya's own attorney has confirmed this (putting a slightly different spin on it, of course). In fact, one of the AIW nurses actually filed a complaint with CPS due to the situations resulting from the number of people being allowed into the house. He calls it an "issue of trust," with Nadya feeling like AIW was focusing on fault-finding.

Nadya may belive that if she hires her own help, she can maintain better control on what information is reported to others. Fine, but you can't blame anyone from AIW for "fault-finding" when Nadya herself has chosen to make a media spectacle of her life. Anyone who follows the story on the internet saw the videos of what actually happened at the house the night the first two babies arrived, and thanks to the Radar Online "daily video blog," the situation continues to be made public on a daily basis. And, Nadya herself has created many photo ops for her loyal following of camera crews, showing her on her shopping trips and outings instead of dealing with family care in the way that most sane parents would. I'm not saying that a new mom shouldn't spend some quality time with the older kids, and even get a little "me time" to take a break now and then. But you can't expect to have any credibility when you're soliciting donations from the general public "for the care of the children" and, at the same time, seen spending lots of money on high-priced clothing and personal care items. Even if these expenditures actually had no real impact on the "family" budget or donations (such as, if someone gave Nadya a $5000 gift certificate for Nordstrom's to "treat herself" a bit), she should keep her personal business private. It's all about the image. Most of us who have raised kids are thinking, "Gee, no one wants you to let yourself go, we all need to look our best to feel our best. But, heck, you could have bought yourself some decent Loreal or Cover Girl cosmetics and saved $950 towards the cost of formula, diapers, wipes, and onesies for the babies" - because that's what most of us have to do.

A related thought that crossed my mind about the AIW situation is the financial arrangement. Though we know that a portion of the nursing care for the babies, at least for a few months, may be charged back to Medicaid, AIW was also requesting donations, because they were wanting to provide some other services, such as extended care for the babies beyond the immediate "preemie" stage of medical risk, and behavioral and educational services for the older kids. This anticipated need for "donations" was based on Nadya's being an unemployed single parent with only the public assistance income for the kids. Based on what we KNOW of Nadya's media "opportunities," we've estimated that she is taking in between $500K and $600K per month, in addition to the regular monthly SSI checks she gets for 11 of the 14 children. So, she is no longer so "destitute" that she should not be expected to help support the care expenses for the babies. Though we haven't yet read about any such discussions transpiring, I would not be surprised if the issue was raised. Nadya may have decided that hiring a few helpers from the community for $500 per week would put less of a dent in her income than contributing to the salaries of trained and experienced neonatal nurses. She will probably find her nannies, especially in today's tight job market where there may indeed be decent and caring people who enjoy working with children to accept the offer. But the problem is (1) They won't have the specialized expertise to deal with the special health needs of eight preemies all at one time, and (2) She will need "around the clock" help for the near future, so this will be different than just having "someone around during the day to help out with the kids" as she had before the octuplets were born. She will need at least three persons per shift for the babies.... that's 9 people right there, and 2 more to help with the older ones too on a day shift. Recruiting and managing a crew like that is quite a human resources undertaking for one person!

I'm not

2017 days ago
109.

sako    

Any idea what kind of insane idea DR.Freakshow McGraw will dream up up next? The poster that said PT Barnum will milk this to the end is right. Hey McGraw maybe if you kept your big nose out of her business, instead of gathering volunteers to get her home baby ready, CPS would being getting off their ass and doing something. We all know McGraw you won't back off till you your employer CBS, says enough, now your killing our ratings. I bet you and 300 of your brown nosers (employees) are scrambling now to cover your ass. AIW is not coming back. What's your next circus act. Oh, that piece of paper you, allred, Conforti and Octoskank signed, that you so proudley displayed to us , take in and shove it were the sun don't shine, Dr.Clown your ideas are a joke

2017 days ago
110.

southsidechicago    

Oh.... sorry, I guess my last post was "off topic" because it was more about the care for the kids than the Vivid offer :) On that subject.... I just got the image of a dozen "Vivid Girls" wandering around a houseful of kids and babies in those "French maid" outfits.... ROFL!

But then I got an even more disturbing thought... wonder if Nadya saw this letter BEFORE she decided to fire the AIW team, and thought it would be more fun than having those very qualified and well-intentioned, but also middle-aged "mom"-ish ladies, around every day reminding her what to do....

2017 days ago
111.

Back Off!    

#106 Hey Chris Brown, you posted in the wrong section you jack#@%!

2017 days ago
112.

Conspiracy Idiots    

Why is no one outraged by those sickos at vivid? This is the sickest thing I've ever read! Anyone who would want to involve children in porno is demented and should be shot.
As far as the rest goes, nadya has proven that she is incapable of taking care of those children. As others have said, this is NOT going to end well. If her young boy is autistic than he will never get the help and attention that he needs. All theses children will end up with mental problems or issues and nadya will eventually snap. The right people need to step in and do something. NOW!

2017 days ago
113.

Mr. Peabody    

Brilliant move by Vivid Entertainment. This is Madonna marketing at its best. First they offered her the million for the movie and now it's the nannies. They realize she will never take the offer but look at how much free publicity they are getting. We should all take notes.

2017 days ago
114.

sako    

Octoskank was smart for firing AIW. It frees up the donator's and taxpayers. Plus Conforti came in with a secret self serving agenda. Would you want a nurse / caregiver spying on your every move. That wasn't a legit offer to begin with." I will take care of your kids and behind your back I will do you in with the authorities". Would you take that offer? Plus Dr. Phil set her up to fail and she fought back. Skank or not? When your set up by Allred and Dr.Phil you fight back. Smart move Octonut. Stay clear of McGraw, Allred and AIW (media whores with our dollars, except AIW their broke). These people will do you in fast. Human nature, isn't people to fight when someone is trying to take your kids?

2017 days ago
115.

chrisa    

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2009/03/23/8859571-ap.html

the link above has the story of her firing the nannies. she is so screwed LMAO @ octo-ho!

2017 days ago
116.

chrisa    

CRASH AND BURN OCTO-LEECH!!!
this is a joyous day indeed! :D

2017 days ago
117.

4beagles    

AIW didnt even last a week, that alone speaks for itself, and these are trained nurses, when all is said and done it probably had to do with the cameras,nadya always rushing to get in front of them,as although octo stated she didnt want all the attention,(yea, right) if she is allowed to pull this off and not stand before the courts for her premeditated act of involving innocent lives, then we no longer have any laws. and what if one or more of those babies hadnt survived? she plainly stated she knew the risk and did it any way. but of course there will always be some money hungry lawyer to defend her,

2017 days ago
118.

Hal    

These poor babies--what's ahead for them..

2017 days ago
119.

chrisa    

oh i have a feeling she will go for the porn offer. i am sure she will star in her own flick, octo-gangabang. see octo-puss take on 8 huge squids one after the other or better yet all at once, i am sure there is "womb" enough for that many at once!

poor actors better wear condoms or she'll be harvesting their donations for her next litter.

2017 days ago
120.

rip    

Octomom is freaking nuts! She intends on doing her porn? Take those kids away from her!

2017 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web