They don't get much better than Meryl Streep.
Here's the 30-year-old two-time Academy Award winning actress back in 1979 (left) -- and 30 years later, the 60-year-old fab version at an event in L.A. last week (right).
She's not playin'.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 4) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Commentsshe was ugly then and is ugly now... i dont get the question lol. sure she hasn't changed much but she was just as terrible looking back then as she is now???
She's very beautiful in an imperfect, believable way. And if you've seen her in Doubt, for example, you know just how puffy, jowly and old she can look without makeup, lit harshly, and uncoiffed.
Dakota, I'll second THAT! She's a phenomenal actress and a very interesting woman indeed!
You'd think that with 30 years of critically acclaimed success, she would do something with her hair! I mean, c'mon, does she dye her roots or what?
Good genes, good makeup and some gentle photoshopping, I think. She actually has wrinkles and is not afraid to show them.
Perhaps another patient of Dr. Klines, On the right picture, it looks like she has thse tell-tale DEMEROL EYES
Get out of here. Her face looks dead, but really thight.. She has had a lot of work done folks
I love Meryl. Huge talent and a wicked sense of humor. One of the few who manage to have an amazing career and is has is not affected by her fame. Not like today,s "stars" who want fame more than to be good at what they do. And she married a non celebrity...Note to (I'm so lonely) Jennifer Aniston.
This woman cracks me up when I see her on interviews! Granted work was done but come on who, with the cash, here when they hit 60 and work where image is everything not go in for a tune up.

















