Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Ringo Starr

Good Genes

or Good Docs?

7/11/2010 4:00 AM PDT BY Johnny Lopez

Former Beatles drummer Ringo Starr really is one of the fab four.

Here's the 24-year-old in London back in 1964 (left) -- and 46 years later, the 70-year-old version at a concert in NYC on Wednesday (right).

Let it be.


No Avatar


His ego is bigger then his nose, I realy liked him in the 60's but the more I see him now, I think how could of I liked such a BIG HEAD.

1572 days ago


Re: earlier comments,

Paul humble? Please, Paul McCartney is a snakecharmer who brought his wife to the US to die so he wouldn't have to pay death tax in the UK. Musically talented or no, he's a greedy sob who knows how to schmooze people when he wants to.

1567 days ago


He was unatractive back then but Paul, John, George was awesome and handsome!!!

1255 days ago


I think it's just good genes. There really aren't any signs of cosmetic surgery. It does kind of look like he's had something done with his lower lids but I looked at some other pictures of him and I think his eyelids just look saggy when he smiles because the ones where he isn't smiling, he doesn't have that problem. :P

1235 days ago


I can't believe how many Haters have commented. Yeesh ! And to the ones who think the young Paul or George were not attractive: I am sorry to hear of your failing eyesight!

1212 days ago


Ringo was a remarkably good-looking guy. I think it's due to natural beauty. (genes) I doubt anybody would want to get the looks due to plastic surgery. (docs) The picture the left is incrdiby beautiful. I love the long shiny brown hair, the pretty blue eyes and the absolutly adorable face. He even looks great with a big nose. The picture on the right is good too, especialy for a 70 year old. Ringo looks about 30 years younger. <3

1056 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3

Around The Web