Susan Sarandon vs. Sinead O'Connor -- Who'd You Rather?

Hitler.

Susan, easy, Shes gorgeous!

I wouldn't touch either of them with a 20 foot stick.

They are both nasty. Susan is a wrinkled old bag who looks every bit her age and then some. She really believes she looks good for her age she looks 70 and has a big fricken mouth. The only one who could stand her was that loser boyfriend Tim Robbins. Both losers can't believe anyone would put them in a movie they both su ck.

Come on Harvey, you have to and "NEITHER" to the choices. Sometime you just can't bring yourself for either of them :) Give us the next choice.

come on now, people. there's a HUGE! difference. polish sausage vs. bratwurst. now those are universes apart.

I wouldn't stick it in Sinead with Jan Lewan's ****.

Neither! They both have big mouths and talk before they think.

TMZ, you should have put a third choice, NEITHER

Susan is a talented actress...and should stick to that.....

Susan, I hope your comments ruin your career just like Sinead's antics did. And for those that say susan is "gorgeous", RUN, DO NOT WALK, to your nearest eye professional and have your eyes checked. That is one FUGLY woman.

FU@K them both

You need to set a time on this one. 1992 Susan vs. 1992 Sinead? No question, Sinead was really good looking despite the no hair thing. Today, Susan looks good for her age while my only thought when I see Sinead is "Oh my gosh, what happened?!?"

Lmao at all the angry right wing catholics. The Pope was in the nazi youth as a child, hence you have to get used to that joke.

I would cut it off rather than "do" either one of these skanks.