Brangelina Guilts Hollywood Into Giving

Paris Hilton / Angelina JolieIt's the Brangelina charity effect.

Thanks to the media mileage Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have wrung out of their Africa charity work, celebrities today are falling over themselves to show the world how public spirited they are.

Latest example: Nicole Kidman, who spent the days before her wedding to crooner Keith Urban visiting Sydney's Children's Hospital with her own kids. The happy couple is reportedly asking guests to donate to charity rather then buy gifts.

In addition, Cher in recent days has drummed up money for troop helmets in Iraq, while K-Fed has thrown his substantial celebrity weight behind the fate of ... pennies.

While the new round of celeb heart pouring is an outgrowth of Brangelina's work in Africa, other celebs have been big in the free-money circuit for years. Big  donators include: Oprah Winfrey, who gave $52 million in 2005 to charity; Sandra Bullock, who donated $1 million twice, once to the Red Cross following 9/11 and the second to Tsunami Relief; and Paul Newman, who has donated nearly  $200 million in after-tax profits of his "Newmans Own" products. There's also Bono who, in our opinion, should be reaching sainthood by the end of the week.

Then there's Paris Hilton, who somehow seems not to have received the charity memo.

Our favorite socialite was recently accused of leaving an Australian children's charity high and dry. Paris reportedly pledged to organize a star-studded benefit concert in Los Angeles to benefit Paradise Kids. The charity claims Paris said she would have friends Backstreet Boys and Blu Cantrell perform, and at one point even Missy Elliott's name was mentioned. So far, two years have passed and Paris has yet to return with the big-name acts. We called Paris' rep and he said he was researching the matter. At press time had not gotten back to us.

This isn't the first time Paris has gotten in trouble for snubbing a charity. At the Elton John Aids Foundation post-Oscar bash she failed to pay for a ticket for entrance to the party. A rep later told the press that Paris had instructed her accountant to cut a check for $10,000 for the foundation.

To help Paris clear up her bad charity karma, we checked to see how she could help others if she followed Angelina's lead and donated one third of her earnings.

According to Forbes magazine, Paris made $6.5 million in 2004. If she gave one-third of that to charity, roughly $2.1 million, here's where the money could go.

* In Namibia she could feed 4,205 families for a year.

* She could build 429 one-room school houses in a developing country, according to Free the Children.

* The North Star Foundation says they could specially train 858 dogs to be companions for autistic children.

* According to Habitat for Humanity's website, they could potentially build either 35 houses in the United States or up to 2,681 houses in some third world countries.

Filed under: Tom & Katie, Brad & Angelina, Nicole Kidman


Tags: Angelina Jolie, AngelinaJolie, brad pitt, BradPitt, charity, elton john, EltonJohn, oprah, paris hIlton, ParisHilton, pauil newman, PauilNewman, pual newman, PualNewman, sandra bullock, SandraBullock

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 5) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. Brangelina has nothing to do with Kidman going to the hospital, she has been an ambassador of the hospital for years and goes there everytime she is home, she has been an Ambassador for UNICEF since 1994 and in addition a new Ambassador for UNIFEM. Brangelina has about as much to do with Kidman's charitable efforts as a salmon living for a long time. Brangelina is doing good work but they are not everybody's source of inspiration, let's get real here!

Posted at 2:39PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Alice

2. I 'm a big Brangelina fan but I think people do what feels right for them. They're not just doing charity work because of Brad and Angelina. what the hell TMZ?

I think you just threw B & A into this because they're threads get the most posts.

Posted at 2:48PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by GOOD

3. More celebrities should be giving back like Brad & Angie, Nicole Kidman, Oprah, and Bono just to name a few. Heck, we all should do more to improve circumstances for others - whether we do it by donating money or by donating time.

Posted at 3:06PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Flo

4. Nicole has been ambassador of unicef for quite sometime and also i think of unifem since jan 2006. It seems she is no longer with unicef, im not surprised coz p to now, she has not done anything for them nor travelled to other countries to promote women's human rights. I read that her first trip will be to India but up to now she has not gone there. I think she is someone who is doing this stuff to improve her image. Unlike angelina, I have yet to see her travel to impoverished nations and be with impoverished people. She is all form no substance and she is really not smart, i have not heard her utter an intelligent sentence in her interviews. she seems to be more obssessed with her clothes and looks, thus the the botoxed face.

Posted at 3:18PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by fiona42

5. Why is it so hard for people to accept Brad and Angelina for the good hearted people that they are? None of the Brangelina bashing has anything to do with Jen. It has evrything to do with jealousy and bitterness. Angelina went to africa, saw the suffering there and it changed her. I watched her in an interview and she admits to having been wild and self centered, but so what! She has had a life changing experience. Judging by the vicious, cruel comments people post, there are alot of people who are in desperate need of a life changing experience. Angelina is very passionate with her work as a UN goodwill ambassador. She and Brad are trying very hard to make it the passion of as many people as possible. The people that keep bashing these two are just bitter jealous people who need someone to bash inorder to feel something,because their hearts are stone cold! We should all be doing our part to help those in need. If their are still some of you who believe that Angelina was the cause of Brad and Jen`s marriage ending, then I have a Bridge I would like to sell you. Brad and Jen`s marriage was over well before Brad even met Angie.

Posted at 3:33PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by jolie fan

6. It's great that Brangelina is helping somebody, but what about the U.S.? Do we not have poor, starving children here? They do not care about their home country at all! I say don't come back traitors! Plus, that's nice of them to have her Dr. fly out of the country for THEIR baby, what about all of his other patients? I guess all their babies are not good enough right?

Posted at 3:38PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Amanda

7. I used to think TMZ was the type of thing that only posted celebrity news with docs behind it, but now I see that all they do is sensationalize crappy news that isn't really noteworthy. What's the correlation between Angie and Nicole? Nicole Kidman has been doing charity work before Angie was even on the radar, so were a lot of other people. Whatever! TMZ sucks a$$ now.

Posted at 3:54PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by nat

8. b & a gave a great gift to the children in africa-----all in small moves. leave them alone, so many people won't even give a dime for anything to do with children. god bless them for trying..... AND FOR THE RECORD, THEY HAVE THREE BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN.....!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 4:11PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by suzan greenhouse

9. Paris Hilton only made $6.5 million last year?! Wow...no wonder shes a selfish whore...according to Brandon Davis' standards, shes even "poorer" than Lindsey Lohan.

Posted at 4:15PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by R.

10. Gee, and it's not like the Backstreet Boys have been busy for the past 2 years.

Posted at 4:37PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Kitty

11. Why is Paris Hilton's picture on this story? What charity has she ever given to, other than herself? SKANK!

Posted at 4:55PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Cindy

12. I agree, these other people mentioned were not "inspired" to do charity work because of Angelina nor Brad. I mean, come on, Bono has done so much that he has been nominated TWICE for the Nobel Peace Prize!
However, if these stars are able to use their popularity to encourage others to take a look at those who are less fortunate in this world and make efforts to help, then all power to them. That is the kind of thing that IS newsworthy. I couldn't care less who Lindsay Lohan is fighting with, or who is the latest starlet with an eating disorder. How does that affect the world?

Posted at 5:26PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by HeatRock

13. o plzz flo like they gave anything they dont care at all theyre just trying to get publicity that so stupid these celebs are nuttin but fakes

Posted at 6:12PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by jhgvbdsph

14. Wow, Paris Hilton claims she's friends with the Backstreet Boys? Riiiiight.

Posted at 6:15PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Sabrina

15. WTF?? I'm a big fan of Angelina Jolie, but get real. Bono has been an advocate for third world countries for close to twenty years so I think it's belittling to suggest that he was "guilted" into helping. Oprah has been giving to charities ever since I can remember and i've been buying Paul Newman products for at least the past ten years. I actually hold the latter two people in higher esteem because while they may contribute overseas, they haven't forgotten about the people in their own country. How tacky to even suggest that!!! Tha's is SOOO National Enquirer. I thought TMZ would be above that.

Posted at 6:36PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by DeeBee

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments