Popped Paparazzo Tells TMZ What Went Down

Clint Brewer: click to watch!The paparazzo arrested yesterday at a day care center attended by Maddox Jolie-Pitt tells TMZ that he did not trespass on the grounds of the center nor did he jump any fences surrounding the facility, and that the police "wanted to make an example out of someone."

TMZ talked to Clint Brewer, who did not want his face shown on camera, last night as he left Lost Hills police station. The 25-year-old freelance photographer said he was detained there by sheriff's deputies for six hours. He says police impounded his Volkswagen Touareg SUV and over $100,000 worth of equipment inside, and that he won't be seeing the stuff until at least July 16, when he has to appear on court on a misdemeanor charge of trespassing.

Hordes of celebrity photographers and videographers have been staking out the Jolie-Pitt compound, its surroundings, and its residents ceaselessly since the couple returned from Namibia with baby Shiloh Nouvel.  Brad Pitt's security chief, Rich Malchar, issued this statement yesterday: "School officials and myself feel that some of these paparazzi are like predators who will recklessly take and sell photos of innocent children for money."



The actual incident for which Brewer was arrested by the Los Angeles County Sheriff is still somewhat unclear, as it was reported yesterday that the lensman jumped a fence at the day care center, and then that he was hiding in bushes at the facility trying to take pictures of young Maddox when he was apprehended by the a member of the day care's staff.

Brewer claims that there is no fence at the day care- at all- and that he didn't take any pictures of Maddox, the proof of which is in the camera that the police confiscated. 

He says that what he was actually arrested for was parking his car on private property, not for trespassing on the grounds of the facility. According to the written complaint that Brewer showed TMZ, the arrest was made for a "602(N)P.C./Trespassing; Driving Veh. On Private Property without Owner's Consent."

Brewer says he was driving up the Pacific Coast Highway to the Jolie-Pitt residence in Malibu when he saw the family going towards the day care center, at which point he followed them and "went to have a look but didn't see anything."

The Jolie-Pitt security asked him to stop shooting, and called the police, who, according to Brewer, "turned up and wanted to make an example out of someone and has [sic]," after which they took him to the station for booking.

Before TMZ spoke to Brewer, he walked out of the police station with his shirt covering his face- classic photo-avoidance maneuver- an ironic pose for someone whose livelihood is earned on the other side of the lens.

Related link:
Brangelina Paparazzo Arrested

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 4) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. Good for Brangelina! Stalking celebrities may not be right and is difficult, but it does come w/the territory. As far as the children--that is ridiculous. They deserve to be left alone. It could also become a very dangerous situation for the kids which i don't think they deserve. I hope this guy gets what's coming to him and hopefully it's not just a slap on a wrist. They should know they're certain boundries and children are one of them!!!

Posted at 11:00AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by ME

2. What a jerk. I hope the celebrities stalk him to get a picture of him. Why is he hiding his face. It looks like the tables have turned on him. LOSER!

Posted at 11:13AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Krissy

3. Poor paparrazi...NOT! What an idiot! You got caught. Deal.

Posted at 12:04PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Trisha

4.
Yeah! Why is he hiding his face if he is not that guilty ???
Shame on you, idiot paparazzi !!!

Posted at 12:04PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by NOY

5. How ironic that this guy has no problem getting in the faces, lives and property of the celebrities he stalks and harrasses, but "requests" anonymity to protect HIS privacy. Can you say "hypocrite"?

Posted at 12:07PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Dee

6. There's a hilarious picture of two paparazzi fighting [like pansies, pulling shirts over their heads] while trying to take pictures of Nicole Kidman. Now we have Brewer getting arrested. It's really a sick and sorry situation. Check out this pictures from the Sydney Morning Herald for a laugh.
These leeches say they're just trying to make a living, but they're so far over the bounds of decency that I think they deserve what they get. And if ridicule is part of it, good.

Posted at 12:20PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Mimi

7. I thought the photo of this guy trying to hide behind his shirt was hilarious. Here's a guy who makes his living taking pictures of people in private moments, that don't want their picture taken, now that the shoe is on the other foot he doesn't find it so pleasant!

Posted at 12:40PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Sharon

8. It's funny how anyone posting on this site would have a negative comment on stalking and paparrazzi's considering this site is exactly that, a site that produces film clips of celebrity watching and you are here looking at it. It's a Catch-22.

Posted at 12:49PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by HughE2030

9. OOOOHHHH!!! POOR BABY!! Now he gets to see what it feels like to have the cameras hound you. That's what he gets!! DUMMY!!! I hope bubba made a man out of him:)

Posted at 12:58PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by stephanie

10. My child attends this school. His car was parked on private property adjacent to the school. He was apprehended on the school's private property. There IS a fence between where his car was parked and where he was apprehended. So he trespassed on at least two pieces of private property and was hiding in the bushes with his camera. Whether he actually took pictures or jumped the fence is irrelevant. As a parent at this school I am thankful to the staff for taking appropriate action to safeguard the children.

Posted at 1:01PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by nuna yerbizniz

11. I guess the guy wants sympathy. He's not getting it from me. I know he has a profession but he does have to realize when to draw the line. There has to be something inside us that tell us when to STOP

Posted at 1:20PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Kenneth

12. re: "It's funny how anyone posting on this site would have a negative comment on stalking and paparrazzi's considering this site is exactly that"...

It's not a Catch-22 at all. There's a difference between taking a photo in a public place, and sneaking onto private property. Calling police on a strange person lurking at a daycare is perfectly reasonable. The guys story makes no sense, if he parked on private property he was trespassing. He took a stupid chance for a money shot and lost.

Posted at 1:35PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Kendall

13. Oh cry me a river. Dude lied and he knows it. WHy can't he just be honest and fully accountable for his actions

Posted at 1:38PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Lilliann

14. Nuna, thanks for setting the record straight. It story just didn't ring true for me but I knew TMZ was not going to really go after a story they just like sensationalizing the heck out of EVERYTHING

Posted at 1:40PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Whydoesitmatter

15. Parents who sell pictures of their kids can't complain about the freebies. They chose to make their kids a commodity.

Posted at 1:59PM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Susan

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments