Rupert Everett - "I Have No Sperm"

Rupert EverettBritish actor Rupert Everett has admitted to being sperm-free.

Everett tells London's Daily Telegraph this is a result of being on alopecia (baldness) medication."I don't have any sperm left. If I stop taking the pills, all my hair will fall out, but I would rather have hair than sperm." What a choice!

Rupert is plugging his autobiography, "Red Carpet and Other Banana Skins," in which he makes some provocative comments on some of Hollywood's biggest stars.

Besides admitting to having a heterosexual affair with Susan Sarandon, the out and proud actor portrays his "My Best Friend's Wedding" co-star Julia Roberts as skittish and says Sharon Stone has become "unhinged." "Sharon Stone is an extraordinary character, extremely intelligent, totally controlling, really fun but...unhinged. And that's kind of fabulous." Nice cover-up Rupe!

But you won't catch Everett saying negative things about his good friend Madonna. As to why she gets off easy in his book, Everett says "Well. We all have authority figures." And her Madgesty appreciates it.

Rupert is even harsh on himself and believes that as he reaches closer to turning 50, "Now no one wants me."

And from the sounds of some of these statements we know why.

Tags: Rupert Everett, RupertEverett

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 1)

1. I'd rather be bald and sperm free, that way I could f**k without a rubber and save money on haircuts!

Posted at 6:42PM on Sep 20th 2006 by Kevin

2. How refreashing. Someone who is actually truthful about himself. Just exposing himself warts and all. You have to respect someone who does that . Very funny post Kevin. ( you could always wear a hat ! )

Posted at 6:55PM on Sep 20th 2006 by the wise old owl.

3. But a hat won't keep him from getting an STD *LOL*

Posted at 8:34PM on Sep 20th 2006 by Nothing Surprises Me Anymore

4. Gee, I am so glad he felt we needed to know this about him...

Posted at 10:08PM on Sep 20th 2006 by the wife

5. I love him as an actor. But he felt free to admit this because he admitted long ago to being gay ..so he doesnt need live sperm. If he ever wanted kids, he could adopt. Think he would be a great dad.

Posted at 7:48AM on Sep 21st 2006 by Matt

6. Who cares if a homosexual has any sperm? If it is a genitic reason people are homosexual & lesbian then why continue the trend?

Posted at 8:00PM on Sep 21st 2006 by stevep

7. I say he should go off the med. He probably has enough money to have a comfortable life for the rest of his years and on a lot of guys, bald can be sexy as heck. He is sexy in either case, just would hate missing the 'payoff' at the end of a lovemaking session...

Posted at 8:03AM on Sep 21st 2006 by Kit

8. Um... no sperm doesn't mean no "payoff". Just means there's no fish swimming in the stream!

Posted at 11:59PM on Oct 15th 2006 by MarcyLove

9. To stevep. Most homosexuals are born from heterosexual parents. So it
isn't logical to say that a homosexual man or woman would have
homosexual children. It is far more than likely they will give birth
to heterosexual children.

That's like saying a bad speller shouldn't have children - because his or her own children would be illiterate.

Posted at 3:21PM on Sep 24th 2006 by Ladi