Who Shot, J.R.? Mag Texts with Rotem on Brit Baby

In Touch magazine says that it has "proof" -- the irrefutable, unquestionable, visual kind, of course -- that J.R. Rotem confirmed to them that Britney Spears is, in fact, pregnant, and that he's the baby daddy.

The mag just sent out pictures of a Blackberry with text messages supposedly from a J.R. Rotem, responding "It's true" to the message, "They are saying Britney's pregnant and you're the father." And then, when asked if Brit will keep the baby, he says, "No clue on what she will do. She is unpredictable."

Of course, what In Touch doesn't point out is that by the magic of phone technology -- gee whizzers, y'all! -- you could use any name for any number -- say, oh, Michael Jackson or Humpty Dumpty -- and send messages back and forth. We're not sure what's going on here -- we're just sayin'.

No first response from J.R. or Brit -- yet.

Filed under: Britney Spears


Tags: Britney Spears, BritneySpears

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 3) | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. PLEASE GOD NO!!!!

Posted at 2:50PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Denise

2. So boring. We all hate her anyway. Way to bring another kid into the world if it's true.. which is doubtful.

Posted at 2:51PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Boring

3. this is so stupid..tmz is getting lame

Posted at 2:53PM on Nov 29th 2007 by mallory

4. OMG -- I'M JUST SAYIN' -- I TOLD MY HUBBY THE OTHER DAY THAT BRIT BRIT IS TO HAVE ANOTHER BRIT BRAT!!!(JOKING) NO REALLY I KNEW SHE WAS PREGGERS, I COULD JUST TELL. IT'S BRITNEY'S BABY BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 2:55PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Sherry P

5. What a worthless whore.

Posted at 2:57PM on Nov 29th 2007 by dust

6. What?! Who would admit to sperminating her? Unless he's fallen on hard times and needs him some alimony....Mony Mony.....Britsamony.

Posted at 2:58PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Dawn Day

7. So the magazine just happens to have Rotem's work number identified in the phone. The phone doesn't automatically bring up the name, you have to put it there. I doubt they took the time to put his name in the phone before the messages, just in case something like this happened.

Posted at 3:01PM on Nov 29th 2007 by KT

8.

That rag is simply trying to sell more magazines.

That's a really shoddy thing to do. Britney has already said that she isn't preggers. It's not like she'd be able to hide the lie forever, right? Not even JLo could do that.

Lame.


Posted at 3:01PM on Nov 29th 2007 by OCD

9. #7--he would only get alimony if he was married to her, having kids has nothing to do with it. I think you are thinking of child support. IDIOT!!!!

Posted at 3:03PM on Nov 29th 2007 by KT

10. Britney is a goddess.

Posted at 3:07PM on Nov 29th 2007 by FIbiker

11. It doesn't look like J.R. Rotem. It looks like Jr. (Junior) Rotem. Who is he anyway? I've never heard of him.

Posted at 3:12PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Kris Peterson

12. Please give Brit SOME privacy...god....this is violating privacy.

Posted at 3:13PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Really!!!

13. This is bogus,dates are different. I don't understand the need to kick someone when they are so far down as it is,so sad. Shame on you Harvey.

Posted at 3:23PM on Nov 29th 2007 by same people

14. In Touch thinks that's proof?? I used to kind of like them, but they've had a sharply downward credibility spiral in the last year or so.

Posted at 3:28PM on Nov 29th 2007 by Hyde

15. Am I the only one who sees the incorrect puntucation in the title of this post? Pitiful.

Posted at 3:54PM on Nov 29th 2007 by hotdog

| 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments