A judge has awarded sole physical custody of Sharon Stone's adopted son to ex hubby Phil Bronstein. Don't worry though -- she still has two other adopted children to fall back on.
Stone had joint custody of 8-year-old Roan. According to an order issued September 12, Stone's request to have the custody agreement changed was denied. Instead the judge awarded "permanent sole physical custody of the child" to Bronstein.
The judge said this new custody agreement was permanent unless Sharon moves closer to Bronstein in San Francisco, or vice versa.
Sharon adopted Roan with Phil Bronstein when they were still together. Stone has two other adopted boys, Laird and Quinn.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 2) | 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments
so if the child was just a stone's throw from tinseltown,
nobody would be complaining or roaning too loud ?
TMZ must have been so late in posting this story because it was taking the interns a long time come up with that clever title. "Maternal Instinct"....get it? Instinct? Get it?
she's a narcissist. She can't take care of herself never mind a child.
That should make Chris Borders, Phil Bronsteins trophy wife real happy lol. She hates kids
Proof, once again, that children are not better off with their mothers. A LOT of Dads are way better parents than society gives them credt for - I won't even go into my situation because its almost unbelievable. I had to fight to get my son from his ... "whatever you want to call the person who gave birth to him" and justice prevailed ! Thank you DHR for doing your job.
She was soooooo Hotin Basic Instinct. What happened to her>
AngelDad...you are rare. My ex is ProstituteLovingMoneyGrubbingEmotionallyAbusiveSh*&Dad.
There has to be more to the story than that-what did she do that was so horrible?
#10 tracey...
"The judge said this new custody agreement was permanent unless Sharon moves closer to Bronstein in San Francisco, or vice versa."
Obviously Ms. Stone wasn't following court orders.
It seems that SHE was complaining about the 50/50 custody arrangement, and was maybe(?) complaining about the distance the child had to travel between the two parents. Maybe the judge suggested that she should move closer to her EX, to keep the 50/50 intact, but she took offense at that. The judge saw that she just wanted to cut her EX out of their son's life - for no good reason, and gave 100% to the dad - until she starts putting her son 1st. It said in the article, that the 50/50 could be restored if one of them moves closer to the other.
Open those legs babe and you might win. the wood rod
THese sternies are mean people who have no feelings:
Her hair looked cute in that movie she did , The Muse.
















