TMZ Sports
Washington Redskins -- The Supreme Challenge

Washington Redskins -- The Supreme ChallengeThe war over the Washington Redskins -- the most offensive team name in professional sports -- might finally go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A group of American Indians is asking the highest court in the land to cancel the trademarks on the Redskins team name and logos -- due to the fact that they're extremely defamatory toward Native Americans.

The American Indian group has been fighting this battle since 1992. They won a ruling in 1999 ... but the decision was defeated soon after by judges who decided they waited too long to bring their case to the courts.

The Redskins -- worth a reported $1.5 billion -- have been using the name since 1933.

Now, the Native American group wants SCOTUS to review the lower court decision -- and finally force Washington to understand why naming an NFL team after the color of someone's skin could be offensive.



Tags: Redskins, Supreme Court, SupremeCourt, Washington

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 11) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. Yikes! Football season is here!

Posted at 10:36AM on Sep 15th 2009 by mrez golucky

2. Offend my nuts you liberal fa66z.

Posted at 10:38AM on Sep 15th 2009 by STFU-LIBERALDOUCHES

3. oh please! HAIL is all I have to say. You cant change something just because you dont like it. No true fan associates the Redskins with anything negetive (other than Jason Cambell of course, who should be replaced any day now)

Posted at 10:39AM on Sep 15th 2009 by tina

4. Tell them to take their tax free money...buy the team and change the name. Some people might find it offensive that many native americans don't have to pay taxes. I have native american blood and am not the least little bit offended by the name of the football team.

Posted at 10:39AM on Sep 15th 2009 by C Plat

5. They tried pulling that garbage with the Cleveland Indians baseball team too a few years ago. The Mascot is Chief Wahoo. Lordy, don't these ppl have anything else to do with their time than wait 50-75 years later after team names have been established and then complain? I think someone's been hitting the peacepipe once too much.

Posted at 10:40AM on Sep 15th 2009 by AClevelandIndian

6. Oh shut up! It doesn't demean anything. It doesn't disrespect anything or anybody. What a bunch of cry-baby idiots. Sitting Bull is probably turing in his grave at the thought of what the modern Indian is doing to the conception of modern Indians.

Posted at 10:41AM on Sep 15th 2009 by Disgusted with Injuns

7. im trying to understand.. how is having a distinguished nfl football team use a symbol of your heritage as their proud logo offensive??? seriously, to me it would be an honor... but maybe im looking at it the wrong way???!!!

Posted at 10:42AM on Sep 15th 2009 by katie

8. Come on! Do you know any "native" Americans with "red" skin? The ones I know are a sort of brownish like Latinas.

Posted at 10:19PM on Sep 16th 2009 by dumbfounded

9. If its so offensive why weren't they against it in 1933, or heck even 1960 but no lets wait 70 years, lose then fight again......
Heres a hint start taxing them, they got to much cash if this is a battle they are picking!!!

Posted at 10:43AM on Sep 15th 2009 by hhhi how are ya???

10. i SAY CHAMGE THE NAME AND GIVE THEM EBOUGH MONEY TOO BIULD 10 MORE GAMBLING CASINOS :)

Posted at 10:44AM on Sep 15th 2009 by homie 1 kanobe

11. Ha!It is very racist. The Redskins suck! Ha! So do the Washing Capitals. The Penguins always beat the Hell ouf of them.

GO STEELERS!!

And, God Bless the American Indian. Time for this football franchise to stop with this nonsense. They stink as it is. Nice game on Sunday against the Giants....LMAO!!

Posted at 10:46AM on Sep 15th 2009 by Dino

12. TMZ CENSORSHIP PRACTICES ARE FAR MORE EXCESSIVE THAN RUSSIA, VENEZUALA AND CHINA! Obviously slanted towards thier own agenda!

Posted at 10:46AM on Sep 15th 2009 by nightcrawler

13. I do not find the team name offensive and I am Native American (I do not collect a free check, I enjoy working for a living and I'm not a drunk, so no one attack me).

Posted at 10:48AM on Sep 15th 2009 by NativeAmericanGirl

14. I have never understood this. They should be honored that they are considered to be a great nationality. Should I be offended because I'm Scandinavian and there are the Minnesota Vikings? What about all those Irish that should be offended by Notre Dame's "Fighting Irish". Some people are waaaaaaaay too sensitive.

Posted at 10:50AM on Sep 15th 2009 by Jacks

15. http://cheapdunk.com/Other-Brand.asp

Posted at 10:53AM on Sep 15th 2009 by miffyilikemuch

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments