The National Museum of Crime & Punishment has officially taken a step to acquire O.J. Simpson's famous "acquittal suit" -- but the museum has a long way to go before it can bag the killer's uniform of injustice. 
In a letter addressed to Fred Goldman, the museum's Chief Operating Officer Janine Vaccarello requests that O.J.'s suit be donated to the NMCP ... the suit the Smithsonian Institution turned down yesterday.
But it's gonna take a lot more than Fred's okay to donate the suit to the NMCP. Fred's attorney, David Cook, tells TMZ a unanimous decision has to be made between Fred, O.J. and Mike Gilbert -- the guy who owns the suit -- before the suit can be donated.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 1)They should take his suit along with Kardashian's 'shocked-he-got-off' head shot and Cocran's 'sh*t-eating-grin-he-got-away with it' head shot!
Wasn't he aquitted? Funny how justice only applies to some people and not others. It would be a great addition to the crime museum's collection though or to a museum about the racial divide.
This is for the dunderheads who said burn Mr. Simpson's suit. If they owned his suit, burning it would be the last thing on their minds. You do not have to have an Einstein I Q to know they would be trying to cash in on it.
I have asked this question over and over, and I still have not received an intelligent answer. How in this country, in the 21th century, can an individual be arrested and convicted for recovering their own property? The thieves in possesion of Mr. Simpson's stolen property did not even get a sclap on the wrist. The kidnapping charge was the most asinine of them all. The whole armed robbery/kidnapping conviction is nothing but a vindictive vendetta for critics who believe he got away with murder. It would behoove you critics to do your homework and you will find a plethora of irrefutable facts that indicate, Mr. simpson is no murderer. If you do not have an intelligent response, please do not reply
















