or type here...
1/17/2011 5:42 PM PST BY TMZ STAFF
Nicole Kidman, Keith Urban -- New Parents!

Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have a new baby, courtesy of a surrogate ... TMZ has learned. 

Nicole Kidman Baby

Sources tell us ... the baby was born at Centennial Medical Center in Nashville on December 28, 2010. Her name is Faith.

Kidman and Urban are Faith's biological parents.

We're told Nicole and Keith went into the hospital on the down low last week, visiting Faith and the surrogate during her stay.   They entered the hospital through the back, took the service elevator to the top floor, which they rented exclusively for themselves.

We're told the baby is home.

Yes, Nicole and Keith were both at the Golden Globes last night.

UPDATE: Keith and Nicole just released a statement to TMZ saying, "Our family is truly blessed, and just so thankful, to have been given the gift of baby Faith Margaret. No words can adequately convey the incredible gratitude that we feel for everyone who was so supportive throughout this process, in particular our gestational carrier."

1110_whos_your_daddy_footer

Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

When you enter your name and email address you'll be sent a link via email to confirm your comment. Please keep your comments relevant to this post. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make the link live for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 12) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments
1.

Pookie:  402 days ago

She's another one with a plastic face!
Ugh!
Going through the rest of her life in a no expression mask!
He will leave her, no doubt for a real person.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
2.

d-nutt:  402 days ago

Which one is the father?

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
3.

R:  402 days ago

The shiiitt's been hitting the fan since the Golden Globes and now this! WTF, Harvey! No TMZLive today!

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
4.

emily:  402 days ago

Couldn't you have picked a better picture of the happy parents? Come on TMZ!

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
5.

R:  402 days ago

I take that back. I see the "Live" section now!

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
6.

skhg:  402 days ago

If true, it's great news!! Couldn't be happier for them, and the fact that they were able to pull it off! Wonderful news!

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
7.

KCB in Washington State:  402 days ago

What wonderful news! A new life is always a joy to celebrate.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
8.

Cooper:  402 days ago

I never heard of a "gestational carrier"...that's a new one.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
9.

Sassy:  402 days ago

Medical technology is such a wonderful thing! Surrogates are a blessing as well. If your body can't carry a pregnancy and you can afford it, how wonderful it is you can still manage to have your own biological child thanks to another woman and advancements in medicine.

Congrats to them!

I agree with Emily. What is up with the wonky photos TMZ uses? When Teena Marie died they also used a sad photo of her.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
10.

Jess:  402 days ago

Good for them! I can't believe they pulled it off without anyone leaking it. I thought she was sporting a little baby bump in her dress at the Golden Globes yesterday. Must have been wrong!

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
11.

croc:  402 days ago

wonder why she couldnt carry her own baby?

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
12.

nobleday:  402 days ago

Creepy term "gestational carrier". Since when did people start talking about "breeders" and other dehumanizing terms to describe the process of having a baby? Gross. What is the world coming to?

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
13.

Diane:  402 days ago

Uppity bitch is too good to risk get stretch marks this time? Must be nice to be rich.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
14.

MZLB:  402 days ago

celebrities too good to have their celebuspawn...sad

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
15.

bob:  402 days ago

gestational carrier?....what happened to surrogate mother? Why does this sound like some sort of lawyer approved definition that leaves out the word mother in the event someone decides, somewhere down the line, that they want to have a relationship of some sort with the baby they carried so that Nicole wouldn't have to go through all the yucky parts of having a kid?

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around the Web