Celebrity Justice
Dennis Quaid Sues Drug Company

Actor Dennis Quaid and wife Kimberly Buffington have filed suit against Baxter Healthcare Corp., the makers of the drug Heparin.
Click to read the lawsuit!
The couple's newborn twins Zoe Grace and Thomas Boone were mistakenly given a massive overdose of the anti-coagulant drug last month while hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. The Quaid's attorney says the twins "were very critical for a while," but appear to have recovered and "everything looks good." They filed suit because they want to prevent this from happening to any other children, Loggans said. The suit claims the Baxter is liable and negligent because the packaging of the 10 unit vial of Heparin looks almost exactly as the 10,000-units-per-milliliter vial of the drug.

Three children died in Indiana from a similar mix-up with the drug.

We're told that the Quaids have not sued Cedars ... yet. Just yesterday, Baxter issued a news release outlining the company's new "drug safety initiative" that promises to change the labeling of Heparin vials.

Cedars-Sinai released the following statement:

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center today announced a series of changes it has made in its medication policies and protocols since November 19, as well as immediate additional training of all nursing and pharmacy staff, as the medical center completed its preliminary investigation into a November 18 medication error involving three patients who erroneously received the wrong concentration of heparin (a medication used to prevent blood clotting) to flush their IV catheters.

The medical center's investigation found that preventable errors made by pharmacy and nursing staff caused the wrong concentration of heparin to be used.

A pharmacy technician failed to follow hospital policy of having another pharmacy technician verify the medication and concentration prior to removing it from main pharmacy inventory. As a result, the technician mistakenly retrieved a higher concentration of heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) instead of the lower-concentration heparin (10 units per milliliter) used for flushing IV catheters.

The higher concentration heparin was delivered to the satellite pharmacy that serves the pediatrics unit. A second pharmacy technician, working in the satellite pharmacy, did not verify the concentration of the delivery from the main pharmacy, as required by hospital policy.

As a result, the higher-concentration heparin was placed in a location in the pediatrics unit where the lower-concentration heparin is kept. The nurses who subsequently administered the heparin to the patients also did not follow hospital policy of verifying the correct medication and dose prior to flushing the intravenous site.

The error was identified later that day by Cedars-Sinai staff, who immediately performed blood tests on the patients to measure blood clotting function. In one of the three patients, the clotting tests returned quickly to normal. The other two patients were given protamine sulfate, a drug that reverses the effects of heparin and helps restore blood clotting function to normal. Additional medical tests and clinical evaluation conducted on the two patients found no adverse effects from the heparin or from the temporary abnormal clotting function.

"Although this was a rare event, and attributable to human error, it is also an important opportunity for the entire institution to explore any and all ways we can further improve medication safety," said Michael L. Langberg, M.D., chief medical officer at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

"On behalf of the medical center, I extend my deepest apologies to the families who were affected by this situation, and we will continue to work with them on any concerns or questions they may have. This was a preventable error, involving a failure to follow our standard policies and procedures, and there is no excuse for that to occur at Cedars-Sinai," Langberg said.

"Cedars-Sinai's reputation as a quality and safety leader nationally is due in large part to an organizational culture of continually improving our systems to minimize any chance of human error. Immediately following this incident we began additional focused education on medication safety to augment our regular training, and have implemented additional procedures and protocols for our pharmacy and nursing staff," Langberg said.

Among the actions Cedars-Sinai has taken in response to the incident:


► High-concentration heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) has been further sequestered in all pharmacies.

► Only saline will be used for peripheral IV catheter flush on all pediatric patient-care units. (It was already the practice on adult patient-care units to use only saline for peripheral IV catheter flush.)

► In addition to the existing policy of having designated high-alert medications (such as heparin) checked by two pharmacy staff prior to the medications leaving the main pharmacy, and then checked again by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy, a new step requires a second check by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy before they place high-alert medications in stock on a patient-care unit.

► In addition to these checks on designated high-alert medications by pharmacy staff, nurses will continue the existing policy of separately verifying medication and dose prior to giving high-alert medications to the patient.

► The existing ongoing training for pharmacy and nursing staff on medication safety policies and protocols has been augmented with immediate focused education on high-alert medications, begun Nov. 20, to reinforce the hospital's high-alert medication safety policies and protocols:

Starting on the evening shift of November 20:

● All nurses (approximately 1800) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices, and were required to pass a written test on the material before they could resume caring for any patients.

● All pharmacy staff (approximately 200) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices.

► The individuals involved in this incident were immediately relieved of duty pending investigation, and appropriate disciplinary actions are being taken.

Langberg said that Cedars-Sinai is also continuing to cooperate with regulatory agencies investigating the incident, and that Cedars-Sinai would make additional changes in policies and protocols if indicated by the regulatory agencies or any additional findings by Cedars-Sinai.

Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Sound Bytes, Nurse!

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 15) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. First bitches!!!

The bottles are different enough for me.

Sue the hospital or the nurse

or the Nurse school.....they are more at fault

Posted at 3:29PM on Dec 4th 2007 by pimp

2. Good.......

Posted at 3:32PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Dina

3. He must need the money. When was the last time he actually was in a movie.

Posted at 3:33PM on Dec 4th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

4. I agree with #1. They're putting the blame in the wrong place. It was human error, not the manufacturers.

Still, I'm glad their babies pulled through this ok. =)

Posted at 3:33PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Frosted flakes

5. Sounds like a good idea to make the manufacturer relabel the product. I am sure the Quaids aren't doing it for the money, but to get something done. The fact this error has happened elsewhere shows that action is needed, and quick.

Posted at 3:35PM on Dec 4th 2007 by homegirl

6. This loser should've sued the hospital.

Posted at 3:35PM on Dec 4th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

7. This is NOT the drug company's fault, this is the fault of nurses who didn't do the simple job of double checking before you shoot somebody up with something. This is COMMON practice to double check and they didn't.

Posted at 3:36PM on Dec 4th 2007 by nise

8. This isn't about the money! It's about what happend to those poor babies. I would sue too. I wouldn't want another baby to go through what his children have been put through. I would sue the hospital as well. I wouldn't sue the drug company. The nurse is the one that made the mistake.

Posted at 3:38PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Nikki

9. Yeah, they look pretty different to me, but then again, I actually looked at the freakin' bottles. Isn't that the job of the hospital employees. Holding the drug company responsible makes no sense to me. Why do people get so litigious and blame everybody? Oh, yeah, money hungry.

Posted at 3:38PM on Dec 4th 2007 by More Hollywood Stupidity

10. God People... he is suing the party that his lawyer (obviously after much consideration and research) is telling him to sue. And I am guessing the lawyers know a little more about this then you.
And yes- someone needs to pay huge this. i can't even imagine...

Posted at 3:39PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Lame Lame Lame

11. I agree with Pimp. The bottles even have different colored lids. Fault lies with the hospital & staff. Glad the babies will be ok.

Posted at 3:40PM on Dec 4th 2007 by itsmerose

12. GET OVER IT! Mistakes are made like this in hospitals every day. Sue, get your money and shut up!

Posted at 3:40PM on Dec 4th 2007 by CedarsCyanideNurse

13. Any idiotic company who would have two blue labels on two different medications deserve to be sued.

Posted at 3:41PM on Dec 4th 2007 by whatever you say

14. I disagree the two vials are the same. Any health care provider and a lot of non health care providers can read the labels and see that both vials contain entirely different strenghts of Heparin. The 10K unit vial is usually placed in IV's and used as a blood thinner. The other vial plainly says that the Heparin is used as a flush for IV's/catheters.
The hospital and person administering the dose to the infants is at fault. It is a case of pure negligence. The infants probably had umbillical caths inserted and the nurse wanted to flush them out but didnt read the vial and used the stronger drug.
I don't know if the hospital is a privately owned one or a state of Californing ran hospital but if the State of Ca runs it the the Quaids are probably barred from suing them under sovereign immunity. That is probably why his attorneys went after the drug company and has not mentioned the hospital or the staff. They have nobody else to sue.

Posted at 3:41PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Deep Pockets

15. He should be suing the person who administered the injection. He/she didn't read the bottle carefully (was probably in a hurry or just careless) as well as the hospital for not following standard procedure with their employees.

Posted at 3:41PM on Dec 4th 2007 by averagejoe

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips

Email Alerts