or type here...
Celebrity Justice7/30/2008 9:37 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
Shia's Passenger's Mom Ain't MADD

Shia LaBeouf's co-star Isabel Lucas -- who was riding in his truck when it flipped over the weekend -- doesn't think the "Transformers" star was drunk when they crashed.

So says her mother, who tells the Cairns Post in Oz that her daughter "would not get into the car with someone she thought was drink-driving," said Beatrice Lucas, using the Britism for DUI. Meanwhile, the mom says Isabel is doing well and is "back at work," unlike Shia, who could be on the bench for as much as a month because of his busted hand.

LaBeouf was charged with misdemeanor DUI for the crash, and yesterday cops said it was the other driver that may have caused the crash.





Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

When you enter your name and email address you'll be sent a link via email to confirm your comment. Please keep your comments relevant to this post. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make the link live for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 1)
1.

pimp:  1292 days ago

She also told her mom that she would not do pot or try s*x on the brown h*ole, but there you have it.

Can we say The Nile??

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
2.

MrEKO:  1292 days ago

Is "drink-driving" really a Britism for DUI if they are from Austrailia? Yes, I know they say it in Britan but they say it in Austrailia too- so there you have it.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
3.

Adam Weishaupt:  1292 days ago

Shia should fight this.

How is he guilty of anything? Doesn't there have to be a victim? If his driving is restricted due to the DUI, then this "thought crime" has infringed his Constitutional protected Natural Right to travel.

If Shia's lawyers were smart, they should how preposterous it is to charge someone with a hypothetical crime. The only reason it applies is some extended jurisdiction. US Code Title 18, 31 defines "Motor Vehicle" as used for "commercial purposes". Like the IRS defines "employee" as an officer of a corporation.

They do this to extend their jurisdiction, infringe our Natural Rights and replace them with state-granted privileges.

Legally, Shia should be operating a "recreational vehicle" or pleasure vehicle, not a "Motor Vehicle".

Read the US Code definitions sometime. Why is the Secretary of the IRS and ATF referred as the same thing? Why is "revenue agent" defined as "any duly authorized Commonwealth Internal Revenue Agent of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico."?

Same reason Shia will get in trouble for his thought crime. It's a game and we've been tricked into a false jurisdiction.

18 CFR 31 -
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00000031----000-.html

27 CFR 26.11 -
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=b4ad9b53ee310df8cf4a99fa5410979a&rgn=div8&view=text&node=27:1.0.1.1.21.2.390.1&idno=27

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
4.

lovecoffee:  1292 days ago

He is so sexy! I don't care what he did or didn't do

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
5.

Aussie:  1291 days ago

It is not a Britism.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0