TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Macaulay's Rep

Blanket is NOT His Baby

8/31/2009 3:40 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

0831_culkin_ex-1Here's a shocker -- Macaulay Culkin's press agent claims the actor is not the biological father of Michael Jackson's son Blanket.

The ridiculous story, which first appeared in The Sun this morning -- and everywhere else 5 minutes later -- explained how Culkin donated the sperm to create Blanket.

So we contacted Culkin's rep Michelle Bega to ask -- because why not -- and we got the following statement:

"The inquiries are too preposterous for us to even acknowledge."

The search for the real sticky bandit continues...



379 COMMENTS

No Avatar
16.

emily    

the only one im pretty sure is michaels biological kid is blanket. he looks just like mike when he was young

1844 days ago
17.

Paparazzo@frog.cc    

MJ's sperm collection must be vast!

1844 days ago
18.

Justin is Calling    

That, plus Blanket is an Indian (as in East Asian Indian) baby adopted from India.

1844 days ago
19.

no way    

Why is everyone so sure they aren't Michael's biological kids?
The only thing you are basing this on is complexion and hair?
The kids, especially the boys look just like Michael, young pre-surgery, Michael Jackson.

1844 days ago
20.

MJ    

Just give it a rest! Michael was their daddy, biological or not. Seriously, how many people are claiming to be their father.

1844 days ago
21.

Creeder    

If Mac is the father than I am the Queen of England.

1844 days ago
22.

FFJ    

Shame on you for even phoning, of course Mack aint his daddy, because Michael is you goons!!

1844 days ago
23.

LakersFan    

Who really was believing this story? This was one of the most ridiculous claims yet.

1844 days ago
24.

Michael - Dad of the Year    

Since Macaulay was one of Michael's "closest" friends from a long time ago, why has he been so silent since his death? Not even one "such a tragic death". Like all of MJ's other artifical friends.

1844 days ago
25.

LakersFan    

16. That, plus Blanket is an Indian (as in East Asian Indian) baby adopted from India.

Posted at 3:09PM on Aug 31st 2009 by Geneticist

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/08/31/macaulays-rep-blanket-is-not-his-baby/2#c21269076#ixzz0Pn1nKJC1
*************************

Blanket was never adopted so you can throw that claim in the trash.

1844 days ago
26.

LakersFan    

23. Since Macaulay was one of Michael's "closest" friends from a long time ago, why has he been so silent since his death? Not even one "such a tragic death". Like all of MJ's other artifical friends.

Posted at 3:16PM on Aug 31st 2009 by justwondering

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/08/31/macaulays-rep-blanket-is-not-his-baby/2#comments#ixzz0Pn2635Ii
********************************

That's because Macualay was a real friend. Notice how all of Michael's real friends have been quiet and have stayed away from the cameras. Diana Ross, Elizabeth Taylor, Macaulay....

1844 days ago
27.

Anna    

MJ IS THOSE KIDS FATHER......GIVE IT A REST, AND MJ IS STILL THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!R.I.P

1844 days ago
28.

sue    

OMG- NO WONDER THESE CELEBRITIES START TAKING DRUGS AND DRINKING LOOK AT WHAT THEY HAVE TO FACE ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS, RUMORS AND RIDICULE, CAULKIN WHAT DID HE DO OTHER THAN BE A GOOD FRIEND TO MJ HE DOSESNT DESERVE TO BE PUT OUT THERE LIKE THIS. .MJ IS THE DAD OF ALL THESE KIDS REGARDLESS OF WHAT ANYONE THINKS HE RAISED THEM ALL AND DID A MARVELOUS JOB AT IT.HE IS THE ONLY DADDY THEY WILL EVER KNOW AND LOVE AS THERE ONLY KNOWN FATHER..IT TAKES A REAL MAN TO BE A DADDY , AND ANYONE CAN BE A FATHER!!!!HE LOVED AND ADORED THESE CHILDREN AND WOULD HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE FOR THEM IF HE HADNT BEEN TAKEN AWAY SO SOON.. THE DOCTOR SHOULD PAY FOR THIS IN EVERY WAY ACCOUNTABLE BY LAW.RIP MJ--SUE FROM TAMPA

1844 days ago
29.

mike    

1844 days ago
30.

Em    

I'm with everyone ahead of me that simply state, Michael Jackson is their father. If your next door neighbor adopted a child, would it be your right to know who the biological parents are? Why does everyone seem to think they have a right to know whether or not Michael is the biological parent of his children? Because he's a celebrity? So what? Michael raised them, took full responsibility for them and, most importantly, loved them unconditionally. That's good enough for me.

1844 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web