Fred Durst's Marriage -- One Month and Done

Fred Durst just filed for divorce against his wife Esther Nazarov -- and the papers say their marriage only lasted a month.

Durst filed the papers in L.A. County Superior Court on Tuesday, citing "irreconcilable differences."

In the papers, Durst says they were married from July 13 until August 25.

The docs don't say if Fred did it all for the nookie.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 3) | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. Big surprise!

Posted at 6:53PM on Oct 15th 2009 by Doogie

2. Yikes!



Posted at 6:56PM on Oct 15th 2009 by mrez golucky

3. She was probably scared away from the STD's he must've gotten when he was famous... Okay, just kidding.

Posted at 7:01PM on Oct 15th 2009 by Hannah

4. NEXT

Posted at 7:14PM on Oct 15th 2009 by WHO THE HELL CARES

5. Who's the new girl he met that broke up the one month marriage?

Posted at 7:28PM on Oct 15th 2009 by Bu

6. WAR MACHIDA!!

Posted at 7:33PM on Oct 15th 2009 by MMAComments.com

7. Fred Durst

Posted at 7:34PM on Oct 15th 2009 by ozzman

8. he got married? *crickets*

Posted at 7:34PM on Oct 15th 2009 by Duc

9. Fred Durst is a douche bag...

Posted at 7:35PM on Oct 15th 2009 by ozzman

10. Glad you didn't wait too long Fred. It will take about the same amount of time for Lamar Odem, to tell his new ride , he isn't going to sign the marriage license.:)

Posted at 8:05PM on Oct 15th 2009 by homie1kanobe

11. I'm glad you didn't wait too long Fred. That's about the same amount of time Lamar Odem is going to tell his new bride, he won't be signing the marriage license...:-)

Posted at 8:10PM on Oct 15th 2009 by homie1kanobe

12. Well at least he didn't kill her.

*Newlywed killer gets fresh chance at parole*

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, October 15, 2009

The Board of Parole Hearings had no evidence to support its April 2008 decision that found Dennis Anderson unsuitable for parole and put off his next hearing until 2011, said the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco.

In Tuesday's 3-0 ruling, the court told the board to hold another hearing within 60 days and decide whether the facts of Anderson's crime showed he is still dangerous.

Anderson, an attorney since 1972, shot his wife, Karen Stoker-Anderson, and her boyfriend Donald Mason of Foster City outside her San Mateo home in October 1984.

The Andersons had gotten married 20 days earlier. During their honeymoon, the court said, Stoker-Anderson told her husband she had made a mistake, was still in love with Mason and wanted to annul the marriage.

He agreed and went to a lawyer with her to discuss the arrangements. But when he went to her home two days later to pick up some belongings, he found Mason there, got his shotgun and killed them both.

Anderson was convicted of two counts of second-degree murder and sentenced to 17 years to life. A federal judge ruled in 1995 that he had been mentally incompetent to stand trial, but he was convicted by another jury in 1997 and received the same sentence.

The appeals court said Anderson had been diagnosed in prison as suffering from bipolar disorder that had been out of control at the time of the killings and had been aggravated by his heavy drinking. Anderson has undergone treatment in prison and has been free of symptoms of the disorder for five years, the court said.

During his imprisonment, he has tutored blind inmates in braille, set up a hospice program for terminally ill inmates, served as a Roman Catholic minister and helped establish a financial planning program designed mainly for inmates suffering from AIDS, the court said.

It said prison psychologists have found since 1994 that he would pose little risk to the public if released. His only disciplinary violation was a 1989 citation for hoarding medication for a suicide attempt.

In denying parole, the board said Anderson lacked insight into his crimes and was using his bipolar disorder as an excuse.

The court said those findings were contradicted by the evidence, which showed that Anderson has taken full responsibility for the murders.

"Given Anderson's apparent rehabilitation and the static, unchanging circumstances of the crime," the court said, the board must identify aspects of the murders that show he remains dangerous in order to justify denying parole again.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/15/BAE71A5U0R.DTL#ixzz0U3MNBhJ2


Or see http://www.Familylawcourts.com/domestic.html

Posted at 8:16PM on Oct 15th 2009 by Bonnie

13. he looks homeless

Posted at 8:24PM on Oct 15th 2009 by MZLB

14. This is so a week ago--I had a blog on my MySpace about how he needs a publicist after announcing this on Twitter. TMZ, you're such elitists on what news you'll put your name on, yet you put up news that's really a week old. Come on! Next time I tell you about a porn parody, you better post it to your website and cover it on TV!

Posted at 8:48PM on Oct 15th 2009 by Natty Badanov

15. It's a common rumor that he's hung like a hamster and lousy in bed.

Just say'n

Posted at 8:55PM on Oct 15th 2009 by ivana tinkle

| 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments