or type here...
Celebrity Justice8/11/2010 8:40 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
Paris Hilton Sued for $35 Million over Hair Extensions

Paris Hilton is being sued by a hair extension company which claims the heiress signed a multi-million dollar contract to use and promote their fake locks ... and then totally blew them off -- causing $35,000,000 in damages.

Paris Hilton Hair Extensions

According to a lawsuit, filed in L.A. County Superior Court, Hilton got just over $3.5 million since agreeing to become the spokesperson for Hairtech International's Dream Catchers hair extension line  back in 2007.

But according to the docs, Paris didn't satisfy her end of the bargain -- when Hairtech claims she was "seen in magazines and on television not wearing [their] hair extensions and was in fact wearing competitors' hair extension products."

Hairtech also claims she screwed them over when she went to jail in June 2007 -- because there was "an implied" term in her contract that she would "obey the law."

In fact, Hairtech claims Paris served her time when she was supposed to be at a very important "launch party" for the hair extensions.

In the suit, Hairtech claims that "more than 600 hair extension professionals" were scheduled to attend at the party -- but because Paris couldn't make it, they lost opportunities which should have resulted in $6.6 million in revenue.

Now, Hairtech is accusing Paris of fraud and deceit -- and claims they ultimately lost $35 million because of her actions.

An attorney for Hilton tells TMZ: "There is no merit whatsoever to any of these claims. We will pursue all of our defenses vigorously and any potential counter claims."

Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

When you enter your name and email address you'll be sent a link via email to confirm your comment. Please keep your comments relevant to this post. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make the link live for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 8) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments
1.

amber:  551 days ago

what is wrong with her face? it looks like a greased up hemorrhoid

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
2.

Curt:  551 days ago

I doubt she even has 35 million to pay up! She is just washed up.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
3.

Dee:  551 days ago

who cares about this ugly mess. talk about something that matters will ya

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
4.

Dee:  551 days ago

Shes old news. Getting uglier by the minute too

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
5.

Ehécatl:  551 days ago

The sophisticated Paris Hilton is spokesmodel for hair extensions called "Clipin-go"????

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
6.

Kelly:  551 days ago

2007? Its 2010. A little late in suing her, aren't we? It must have not been that interesting.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
7.

Hollywood:  551 days ago

On the bright side, they could have loaned Lindsay Lohan expensive jewelry, which of course, "disappeared"

Did they really expect Hilton to be professional??

He entire life is about DRAMA

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
8.

Matt :  551 days ago

No chance for this lawsuit, they are just trying to get press by using Paris's name.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
9.

amber:  551 days ago

WEEEE want the WONK! Gotta have the WONK! Wonkey eyed hizzo

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
10.

Dee:  551 days ago

When she got out of jail she said she was sick of partying and wanted to do something important. Is selling clip and go hair extentions her legacy lol HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA WHAT A FOOL FOR THE CITY

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
11.

Spot:  551 days ago

Everybody sues Paris and nobody ever wins.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
12.

Ehécatl:  551 days ago

Teach her a lesson, Hairtech. Rip her hair out. Then she´ll HAVE to use your crappy extensions.

And stop calling them "Dream Catchers". It makes your hair extensions sound like Barbie accessories.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
13.

Mokie:  551 days ago

Thats the Paris Hilton at the Hollywood Wax Museum right?

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
14.

Truth:  551 days ago

SOUNDS LIKE PARIS JUST LOST. OBVIOUSLY THE BIOTCH NEVER BOTHERED TO LOOK AT CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT BEFORE SCREWING OFF BY PARTYING AND BREAKING THE LAW. ETHICAL CLAUSES ARE COMMON THESE DAYS REGARDING DOUCHE BAG CELEB BEHAVIOR. SHE'S DONE!! ...UNLESS OF COURSE HER MOMMY AND DADDY BAILS HER FAKE ASS OUT. SHAME!!

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
15.

Carl:  551 days ago

"Implied" and "contract" are not words that go together. Either the contract said breaking the law violated the contract or it didn't. I think they should focus more on the "did she wear and promote them or not" aspect of the case and not the she was in jail part.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments