TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Debbie Rowe to Judge:

I Support Joint

Guardianship of MJ's Kids

8/9/2012 4:55 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
EXCLUSIVE

0809_debbie_rowe_tmz_article
Debbie Rowe -- the woman who gave birth to two of Michael Jackson's children -- has filed legal papers saying she SUPPORTS the new joint guardianship arrangement ... but is warning TJ and Katherine that she WILL intervene if things don't work out.

Rowe filed the documents in L.A. County Superior Court today ... saying she has reviewed the co-guardianship application and signed off on the deal reached between TJ and Katherine to share parenting responsibilities for Paris, Blanket and Prince.

But in the docs, Debbie warns ... "Should the arrangement sought by TJ Jackson and Katherine Jackson become untenable, unstable, unsafe, or in any way contrary to the best interests of the children, Ms. Rowe will seek court intervention."

Rowe claims her concern is for the health, safety and well-being of HER children; and says she will continue to ensure their needs are met.

Remember, when TJ first petitioned for guardianship, the judge said that Debbie must be notified.

0725_mj_kids_footer_v2

293 COMMENTS

No Avatar
31.

LRT    

She never has to worry about getting...THE MOTHER OF THE YEAR AWARD!

620 days ago
32.

Yikes!    

Didn't she sell the kids off? Why does she have a say? And where the hell is Diana Ross?!?

620 days ago
33.

What I Think    

So now the incubator has spoken.

620 days ago
34.

tucker    

WHO cares if she approves? She lost her right to an opinion when she sold her children. She was never anything more than an incubator.

620 days ago
35.

sunnyjazzislove    

I'm glad. Those kids seem to have a lot of people who care for & love them. They are more blessed than they probably know.

620 days ago
36.

rick    

Hot snack smelling from Jackson's compound someone crawled out to have some.

620 days ago
37.

Marie     

She (Debbie) should have no say in those kids lives. She is a worthless piece of trash that sold her kids for money. F her!!!!

620 days ago
38.

mj fan forever    

This horrible woman has absolutely NO right and NO say in Michael Jackson's children's lives!!!!! She had those children only and exclusively for money and then blackmailed Michael Jackson during the trial getting even more money!!! She is a really bad model for the children, Michael did NOT want her around his children for a very good reason and she should only stay away!!!! Michael named Diana Ross for a very good reason and she should step up and take Michael's children instead of hesitating!!!! The judge made a mistake ordering to notify also to this disgusting woman, not even he seems very interested in seeking what is truly in the interest of children, this is only unfair, they should do Michael's will, no one can know better than him what is more right for his children!!!!

620 days ago
39.

ylg    

MJ bought and paid for those kids. Why does she still have a say so. She turned them over to M J.

620 days ago
40.

verlinda    

This ugly bitch needs to go back under her rock. SHE SOLD THE KIDS!! Now she wants to play mommy. MJ said nothing about her taking custody. I don't understand why his Will and wishes are not being followed

620 days ago
41.

rochelle1    

Good Good

620 days ago
42.

rochelle1    

She didn't sale her kids.../

620 days ago
43.

rochelle1    

She was watching out for them. Lady I do understand!!

620 days ago
44.

cherokeesky34    

Here's some food for thought.... Whether or not we consider Debbie their Mother.... PARIS DOES. She posts pics of her mom and dad together, holding each of the children, and leaves the sweetest, loving posts about her mom. I don't know what went down behind the scenes with Debbie and Michael, but regardless... Paris (if not Prince also) calls her mother, refers to her as mom, and posts nice things about her. The woman must have made a positive impact on the children for them to do that. Regardless of what people think. And as for Diana.. do yall HONESTLY think after all this time of not bothering to get involved, that she's gonna get some sense of duty and show up? Don't hold your breath.

620 days ago
45.

Looper73    

Can someone please explain to me what her legal claim is to these children? I realize she married Michael, but didn't she initially act as a surrogate to him as a favor? And I know she gave up all "legal" claims to them, but he's dead and she's still the biological mother, so doesn't she still have more of a claim to the kids than their uncles, cousins...or Diana Ross?

620 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web