Celebrity Justice
Lawsuit Over "Pirates of the Caribbean"

Pirates of the CaribbeanA Hollywood screenwriter is suing pretty much everyone involved with "Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl," the first installment of the now record-breaking "Pirates" series.

Royce Mathew claims in the 80s and 90s, he "created and wrote a number of original works including drawings, screenplays, outlines, blueprints, storyboards and other original materials...which he generally entitled "SNPM," standing for 'Super Natural Pirate Movie.'"

According to the lawsuit, obtained by TMZ and filed in United States District Court, Central District of California, Royce alleges he created "various drawings depicting his pirate ship, which he named the Black Pearl, and an original design for a 'medallion,' both of which are are central elements of his screenplay." Royce says he registered the drawings and his screenplay with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Royce says the screenplay contained a blacksmith/swordsman named Will Turner, an eccentric pirate captain and a unique cursed crew whose curse was revealed only in the moonlight. Royce claims the daughter of a British governor named Elizabeth falls in love with Will Turner. In "Pirates of the Caribbean," Orlando Bloom plays Will Turner and Keira Knightley plays Elizabeth Swann, who falls in love with Will Turner.



In the lawsuit, Royce says he shopped his materials between 1991 through 1995 to various defendants, both directly and through the William Morris Agency and Creative Artist Agency. Royce claims his materials were rejected and then the first "Pirates of the Caribbean" was created, allegedly using his work as a blueprint.

The first "Pirates" movie raked in $655 million worldwide.

Royce is suing, among others, The Walt Disney Company, Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Touchstone Home Video, Jerry Bruckheimer, Inc., and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. He is asking for unspecified damages and an injunction prohibiting the defendants from publicly displaying the movie.

Royce is also asking that all copies of "Pirates" that the defendants control be impounded.

Although the lawsuit does not mention the two "Pirates" sequels, it does ask the judge to issue an injunction against the first "Pirates" and "other infringing works."

A Disney spokewoman says the suit "has no merit."

Click here to see the documents.

Tags: johnny depp, JohnnyDepp, keira knightley, KeiraKnightley, orlando bloom, OrlandoBloom, pirates of the caribbean, PiratesOfTheCaribbean

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 3) | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. The story line is what makes the movie.

Posted at 1:33PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Tyler

2. Please!!! Why didn't he sue when the first movie came out!! What ever!!

Posted at 1:49PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Amy

3. When a movie makes as much money as Pirates everyone wants a piece of the fortune.

Posted at 1:54PM on Jul 11th 2006 by wndrflwmn8

4. what a jackass, just sounds too convenient for me. everyone wants easy money.

Posted at 2:08PM on Jul 11th 2006 by bloodlust347

5. Y'know, he's right: How could they ever have created a gold doubloon with a skull on it without his drawing? Or a governor's daughter who falls for a pirate (Olivia de Havilland, anyone)? Or an eccentric pirate captain (and Depp brought in most of the eccentricities of Sparrow on his own)? Or a reluctant young pirate brought onto the ship as a youth (as in Pirates of Penzance)? .... Classic images that are pretty much in the public domain. Desperate fellow, methinks.

Posted at 2:16PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Leigh Barrett

6. "Please!!! Why didn't he sue when the first movie came out!! What ever!!

Posted at 1:49PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Amy"

Lawsuit as big as this can, often times, take years to process through the legal court system, therefore, he could've easily sued the day after the first one came out. I'm not on either side, but the evidence is generally astounding. With a patented script in the year 1995 with the said details, it is pretty incriminating. On the other hand, some of the details are too much and maybe added on last second for this same purpose.

Posted at 2:23PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Tony

7. "...images that are pretty much in the public domain..." Sure I would agree if it was an just an individual aspect, (i.e. cursed gold, or the ship's name...) but how can you argue, "...images that are pretty much in the public domain..." when so many of the same exact elements exist in both the defendant's version and the plantiff's, with the same exact names? However, I don't even remember reading about the complaint listing "an eccentric pirate captain." But when you put it all together it's too close to say. I read thru the actual documents and I think he has a solid case. Disney is going to have to prove this is a complete coincidence and was unaware this existed. But it's going to be hard since all of defendant's items are copyrighted before pre-production even began and the defandant gave copies of the copyrighted material directly to Disney representatives and agents in the early 90's.

Posted at 2:37PM on Jul 11th 2006 by lycanthos

8. Unless he has proof of the DATES that he created all his "images" and "ideas" this lawsuit won't go far. If he seriously had this idea first, don't you think he would have tried suing as soon as the first movie was advertised? The "idea" of the movie and "images" were in those previews - the ship, gold coin. I think if he wasn't just trying to get money out of this he would have taken action long ago.

Posted at 2:49PM on Jul 11th 2006 by mandy

9. Sadly, this is the USA that we live in now. Anyone can sue big businesses because there is no legal reform. Make it so that whoever LOSES the lawsuit has to pay ALL the legal fees for both sides and we'll see alot less of this kind of stuff. Besides, these never go to court anyway, businesses just settle for some insane amount and pass on the costs to the rest of us as consumers.

Posted at 2:57PM on Jul 11th 2006 by chuck

10. sueing for what?? Just want to make a buck for himself that's all. I like the Pirate movie. I haven't seen the second movie yet but will soon. And I will like it as well.

Posted at 3:03PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Joey

11. While I don't know about this situation, it wouldn't be the first time such a thing has happened. If he didn't make every one of the people he showed these things to sign a nondisclosure agreement, there's little that can be done.

Posted at 3:08PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Mai

12. It probably took him this long to come up with his fake storyboards and scripts for the first one.

Posted at 3:09PM on Jul 11th 2006 by hulk

13. Wow

Ever1 these days want to sue.... i mean a finger in wendy's chili to sueing a movie thats been out for like more than a year. Tells you how much people are driven to get a fortune and screw everybody else

Posted at 3:31PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Alexis

14. Bottom line is if the date of the dude's registered documents is legit, he's got a case. And remember it's not the first time Disney's gone to court for this, remember Atlantis? As to the timing, that's actually perfect, not only claiming a piece of the first but the second movie too, rather than shutting down the cash cow too soon.

Posted at 3:57PM on Jul 11th 2006 by D Adams

15. if he copyrighted everything then the courts would have seen that and he wouldnt be going to court for very long.....except to "claim" his funds!! .. so he obviously needs to get a life ----and a real job like the rest of us !!!!! copyrighted things are registered and if it was true he did that then like everyone else has basically said--hes the stupid one for not suing earlier...and i thought the makers of the movie had an IMAGINATION!!!! ha GOOD-GRIEF!! some people's kids!!

Posted at 4:07PM on Jul 11th 2006 by char

| 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments