Rowe Settles Custody Issues Over Jackson Kids

16. A very shrewd, correct decision.
There is no way that the childred can grow up without contact to their Mother, whatsoever happened, or people 'think'. I wish them all the best, with all the love of Michael in their hearts and memories, for their hopefully happy future.
Debbie: My respect for a carefully thought-out decision taking the interests of the children as top-priority!
sandra/vienna, austria

Posted at 11:20AM on Jul 30th 2009 by sandylock

17. WHO GIVES A RATS ASS!!!!!

Posted at 8:38AM on Jul 30th 2009 by MindTerrorist

18. One other thing....She was NEVER suppose to be their mother. It was all business.

Posted at 8:41AM on Jul 30th 2009 by Whamo

19.
IF EVERYONE IS HAPPY...

MJ CAN R I P !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 10:05AM on Jul 30th 2009 by JANE DOE

20. and she is any worse than the kids being around some doped up freak of nature half out of his mind on drugs..these kids must think its normal to have a robot for a dad so how can she be any worse,Now they are owned buy grandma robot who im sure is half out of what little mind she has left.Oh the humanity..

Posted at 8:42AM on Jul 30th 2009 by dr. det cyclops..esq.

21. Finally someone does and says something sensible in this whole thing. Whoever came up with the idea that the children need help and time to adjust to Deb - herself or someone else - did some good thinking. I hope she will be a good visiting Mom and that all will benefit from the arrangement. Maybe she will need some counseling too, to sort out the strange tangle of dealings and deals with Michael Jackson in respect to the kids.

Posted at 8:44AM on Jul 30th 2009 by aston

22. Finally! Someone who is actually thinking of these kids. Yes, she WAS the childrens' surrogate, but once Michael died, this changed. Anyone with the capacity to reason can understand how this woman felt the obligation for these kids as both she and Michael recognized that he was the primary caregiver--primary, not the only.

It is lovely to see someone who is dealing with the situation with love and caring.

Posted at 8:46AM on Jul 30th 2009 by disfasia

23. Let the beatings begin!

Posted at 8:46AM on Jul 30th 2009 by Mikey

24. All i got to say is that we are all human we all have the same right celebrities should not be treated like gods. yes michael jackson passed very sad about that but let him go in peace we are keeping his spirit alive and it needs to go to a better place.
When he makes it to heaven he will look down at us and smile. he wont be looking only at people like chris brown and madona but every one. So i think celebrities are fake. well most of them they know who they are. it kills me to see only celebrities in newspapers and magizines. its sick and not right. how bout put this in a magizine so the know how citizens feel!!!!

Posted at 9:26AM on Jul 30th 2009 by Malik Clanton

25. I commend Ms. Rowe for agreeing on what seems to be a temporary custody agreement and a delay of millions of dollars that she will indirectly inherit from Michael Jackson’s estate once she gains the children trusts and become their legal guardians. What better way to assist her in this endeavor that to have the support of a psychologist- legal medical documentation. Ms. Rowe is using her head wisely and thinking about the psychological future of these children that will equate to millions of dollars that Ms. Rowe will eventually earn. She’s also positioning herself in such a way that America will forgive her for selling her children in the past for millions of dollars. This forgiveness will support her in the millions of dollars that she is expected to earn once she becomes the children legal guardian. Smart move Ms. Rowe!!! Smart Move.

Posted at 8:47AM on Jul 30th 2009 by MirraSeis

26. sounds reasonable to me. and i agree with whamo. why is everyone picking on her. as far as i know she's never said a bad word about michael or his skills as a father. quite to the contrary.

Posted at 8:49AM on Jul 30th 2009 by Sanne

27. I cannot help but wonder: how screwed up will these kids end up?

Posted at 8:49AM on Jul 30th 2009 by georgiehopper

28. On Bashir Prince said Michael had told him he didnt have a mother. Thats the type of person MJ was. He TOLD his children they didnt have a mother - that is from MJs own mouth and it disgusts me.

Read Debbie Rowes Court testimony she had been trying to get visitation to those children for ages and Michael Jackson promised it then went back on his promise time and time again. What kind of father does that?????

I hope those kids can forgive him now they know the truth.

Posted at 8:49AM on Jul 30th 2009 by lets not forget the past

29. Well, thank goodness this part has been cleared up! Give all these people some credit, folks! You may think whatever you want, but the bottom line - everyone involved was thinking of what's best for the children! KUDOS... It's hard enough on all of them, without the rest of the circus! I applaud them for keeping it out of court - Michael knew what he was doing - let him rest in peace!

Posted at 8:51AM on Jul 30th 2009 by shortstuff

30. VERY STRANGE !!! SHE SAID IN AN INTERVIEW THAT SHE WAS GIVING UP HER PARENTAL RIGHTS AND THAT SHE NEVER WANTED THESE CHILDREN TO CALL HER MOM..AND NOW SHE'S COMING BACK TOWARDS THE CHILDREN. HUMM...PROBABLY NOT VERY HEALTHY FOR THEM..!!!
PEOPLE CAN BE REALLY WEIRD SOMETIMES...I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND IT.
LM

Posted at 8:52AM on Jul 30th 2009 by Laurence