TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Mystery Settlement in 'Hangover 2' Tattoo Lawsuit

6/20/2011 2:30 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

Ed Helms' face tattoo will remain permanent after all ... now that the studio behind "Hangover 2" has struck a settlement with the artist who claims he owns the copyright to the famous design.

0620_tattoo_bn

Warner Bros. just announced it has "amicably resolved" its dispute with tattoo artist S. Victor Whitmill -- the guy who put the original face tat on Mike Tyson.

Whitmill sued the studio back in April -- claiming WB never asked for permission before they slapped his work on Ed's face ... a gag that proved to be a HUGE plot point in the movie.

The terms of the deal are confidential -- but due to the fact that WB was going to have to digitally alter the tat on Ed's face for the DVD version of the flick if the two sides couldn't reach an agreement, we're guessing Mr. Whitmill's design didn't come cheap.



0915_tattoo_footer

42 COMMENTS

No Avatar
31.

mooshki    

It was clearly used for parody. The scene with Mike Tyson talking about the tattoo proves that. I hope the guy didn't get too much cash when they paid him to go away. If it had gone to court, he should have lost.

1200 days ago
32.

wild1nc20001    

Owning a copyright to a tribal tattoo, what a joke. I wouldn't of settled with the tattoo artist and if I were the judge I would of tossed it.

1200 days ago
33.

Robert    

The interesting question here is what if I put that tattoo on my face? Would I have to pay a license fee to the original artist? How would that be enforced. Ouch.

1200 days ago
34.

BVO    

I bet he copied the design from a pic somewhere him damn self.

1199 days ago
35.

WatchMyInks    

Nice! It's good to see an artist getting paid properly. He can retire in style now and watch the royalties rolling in for years....

1199 days ago
36.

Puckett    

Dan 17 hours ago
Warner Brothers made millions off the Hangover. I can't believe commenters feel the artists shouldn't get a right to a tiny cut of the action.

It's the artist's exact design, not just a similar 'Maori' style. If you copy a song, for commercial usage, you have to pay. Art is no different.

This artist deserves his cut, as much as anyone else whose art appears in a movie.

----

And the irony is, if ANYONE should have understood the value and legalities surround the use of intellectual property for commercial use...it's a freakin' motion picture studio that's a member of the MPIAA, who mercilessly prosecutes anyone who steals THEIR intellectual property, even if it's for personal use.

1199 days ago
37.

TessaC    

This is total BS - he stole that design from the Maori - the indigenous people from my country - and then kicks a hissy fit saying that he 'owns' it. What a cry baby.

1198 days ago
38.

Susan    

Bogus. You can find that P.O.S. Tribal design in any flash rack across America. All this guy did was tweak a design and all WB did, was tweek it again. What a joke.

1198 days ago
39.

Dominique    

So does that mean if this tattoo artist made a WB Cartoon charter tattoo for his customer can WB sue him

1197 days ago
40.

biggyshorty    

besides he was commisioned to design and tattoo it for mike tyson.. so it belong to him and he did not have issues with it beying used in movie.. should have never gotten a penny.. opportunist

1080 days ago
41.

biggyshorty    

they should have never setled, him beying a tattoo guy im sure he has used WB characters in his tattoo's before so should every tattooer now gett sued for the same reisin.. he should never have gotten a penny

1080 days ago
42.

YUsoSTUPID    

Mike Tyson should sue the tattoo artist for putting that ****e on his face

674 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3

Around The Web