Debbie Rowe -- TV Lies Worth $490k

1. She should have just asked for the even $500,000.

Posted at 10:01AM on Oct 17th 2009 by James in San Diego

2. 490k is so much better than 500k!

Posted at 10:05AM on Oct 17th 2009 by Jennifer

3. The money your getting from the Jacksons for selling off your kids is not enough?? What a pathetic greedy sad exuse of a human being.

Posted at 10:07AM on Oct 17th 2009 by MZLB

4. No, apparently White didn't

Posted at 10:07AM on Oct 17th 2009 by ?

5. ALL ABOARD THE LAWYER TRAIN

////////////////////////////TOOT///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TOOT///////////////////////////////////

Posted at 10:15AM on Oct 17th 2009 by homie1kanobe

6. those kids would be much better off with debbie rowe..if those kids stay wiht wacko jackos family they will b e crack heads within 10 years,,and dopers and maybe even killing someone else..get those kids away from the jacksons,,they will suck the life out of those freaky kids and will someone get those damn kids a haircut..wacko is dead so let them have some peace and be normal ..well for freaks like that...she loves those kids and will take good care of them..

Posted at 10:15AM on Oct 17th 2009 by dr bob

7. Janet Arvizo did go behind bars. It was proven in the 2005 trial that she was a liar, a fraud, and had coached her son to lie in order to obtain a settlement from Michael. Janet Arvizo incriminated herself on the witness stand and a few months later she was arrested and did go to jail. This, of course, did not make headline news but she did go to jail. Serves her right for she tried to do to Michael Jackson. He was free because he was an innocent man and she went behind bars because she was an extortionist, a fraud, a liar and a con artist. All of which Tom Mesereau proved at the trial.

Posted at 10:16AM on Oct 17th 2009 by Anne

8. This woman should just go on with her life! Doesn't she know people aare going to say things. This isn't sue worthy. She already makes a ton of money, so she is going to pay a lot of money to take a interviewer to court? I guess it's ok for her to glean the money off of Jackson forever because she had those kids-the kids who do biologically belong to Klein-bet she knew it too. Bet she bluffed Michael and said lies as well. .

Posted at 10:26AM on Oct 17th 2009 by WhoCares

9. will I be sued if i say she is gross looking

Posted at 10:29AM on Oct 17th 2009 by tweety bird

10. I hope Debbie gets every penny she is asking for. The disgusting media ran with this story and tried to make Debbie seem like a money hungry whore who sold her kids. When she has said time and time again, she wanted to give birth to the King of Pops children, that she was never interested in being a mom. I don't blame her, I would have done it too.

Lucky biatch...

Posted at 10:31AM on Oct 17th 2009 by I want a baby MJ

11. Question for Debbie: have u ever visited ur two children since u were given visitation rights?

NO. so that proves she doesn't give a dang about them. she just wanted the deal with Katherine, to get more $. that's all.

Posted at 10:32AM on Oct 17th 2009 by gGlam

12. "WhoCares", I don't agree that Debbie should just let it go. No one should be able to discredit someone else in the media and get away with it. Lies destroy lives.

Posted at 10:40AM on Oct 17th 2009 by Nicke

13. But doesn't want the kids or she would not have given Michael sole custody of Prince and Paris. So where is the lie?

Michael! Michael! Michael!
I love you most!
God bless you and your children!

Posted at 10:44AM on Oct 17th 2009 by Michelle

14.
I understand women having children for other women, who can't.

However, although I don't understand having a child and then disavowing the child for a house and horses and such, I am very grateful that mindset is beyond my grasp.

Posted at 10:45AM on Oct 17th 2009 by Bonnie

15. She loved MJ and I know she had money from him but she did give him children which didn't happen with LMP.

Posted at 10:49AM on Oct 17th 2009 by Jan