The Mistake in Michael Jackson's Will

Michael JacksonjMichael Jackson's 2002 will has a mistake in it, TMZ has learned -- but it looks like a case of no harm, no foul.

As we first reported, according to the will -- dated July 7, 2002 -- it was signed in Los Angeles. But Randy Jackson told TMZ Michael was in New York City on that date.

Randy thinks the signature on Michael's will is a forgery. But Howard Weitzman, the lawyer for the estate, tells TMZ the signature is valid and the witnesses saw Jackson put pen to paper.

We've now confirmed Jackson definitely signed the will in New York City on 7-7-02. So the reference to Los Angeles is clearly a mistake.

Our sources say the person who wrote "Los Angeles" is one of the witnesses to the will and simply forgot where he was.

This mistake will not invalidate the will. Ironically, if the will were declared invalid, the prior 1997 will would be probated. Just like the 2002 will, the 1997 will creates a trust. We've learned the '97 trust -- just like the 2002 trust -- leaves the same percentage to the same people: Katherine Jackson gets 40% for her lifetime, MJ's kids get 40% and the remaining 20% goes to charity.

By the way ... guess who one of the executors is in the '97 will? John Branca.



Tags: estate, john branca, JohnBranca, los angeles, LosAngeles, michael jackson, MichaelJackson, new york, new york city, NewYork, NewYorkCity, randy jackson, RandyJackson, will, witnesses

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 15) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. First! Maybe...

Posted at 2:02AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by Sheila

2. i love you more

Posted at 2:03AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by hope

3. oh wow, first! You guys must've just put this up here, well I'm glad everything seems to be ok with the will

Posted at 2:03AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by MacConvie

4. Balls

Posted at 5:38AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by Balls

5. what is the reflection of in his sunglasses?

Posted at 2:06AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by lacy

6. zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted at 2:06AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by Simone

7. Ha ha. The slimy Jackson family still gets nothing! Suckas!

Posted at 2:07AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by Paparazzo@frog.cc

8. Thank God!!!!!!
Mike did the right thing,there only after the money.....
Miss you Mike.

Posted at 2:07AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by JMA

9. There NOT making there selfs popular......
Did Randy not ask Michael for money........I forgot????

Posted at 2:11AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by JMA

10. thamk you TMZ great picture of mj

Posted at 2:12AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by djj

11. Why do Harvey have to be drinking something in every show? Put the cup down and lets rip on some hollywood mo fo's bra, lol adios.

Posted at 2:12AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by william

12. Love you, Michael - great shades you have there. Miss you. Wish everyone could just get along regarding your will.

Posted at 2:16AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by MsMeowzers

13. Great news.Michaels kids will not have to worry while Branca and Mclain are in charge of the estate.

Posted at 2:19AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by anniam

14. Holly crap!!!!! I just lose the opportunity to be the first in a MJ's board!!!!!!! It's a sad situation... : (

Posted at 2:20AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by Simone

15. The only reason for the 2002 will was to revise the 1997 will to include Blanket after he was born.

Too bad, Randy and Joe, you still don't get Michael's money.

Posted at 2:22AM on Oct 22nd 2009 by Smooth Criminals

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.