Prosecutor Danette Meyers told the judge during Lindsay's probation violation hearing ... she has witnesses who will clearly show Lindsay was drinking after the MTV Movie Awards when her SCRAM bracelet showed a positive reading for alcohol.
And there's more ... Meyers insisted if Lindsay was drinking it should constitute a violation of her probation and subject her to jail. Judge Marsha Revel initially said drinking in and of itself was not a violation of probation -- it was just a bail restriction.
But Meyers argued under the terms of Lindsay's probation, she was required to obey all rules and regulations of the court, and no drinking was one of the rules. The judge seemed somewhat sympathetic to Meyers' argument.
Meyers also suggested Lindsay's SCRAM device was tampered with.
The judge will allow Meyers to call witnesses to prove if Lindsay was drinking. And the judge seemed skeptical that a SCRAM could go off where the person wearing it did not consume alcohol.
And one more thing ... Judge Revel said, if Lindsay was in denial about drinking, that would be relevant in the probation violation hearing -- meaning it shows things are pretty desperate.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 3) | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 CommentsWhy is this sooooooooo dragged out? What a waste of time and taxpayer $$$$$$$$$$$... If she wants to drink and drug her self to death. Soooooooo be it!
Get that skank in jail finally....Maybe it will wake her dumbass up and I won't have to hear about her in every media blog
LiLo looks so much hooter than that reggetty black hair she sported last time. I don't think she's going to the slammer! If she does I hope it is an all girls prison. Oh what a movie!
Da Judge ain't buying the crap, hooray, lets see Lezby do some jail time!
Am I the only one who thinks that the prosecutor shouldn't have to prove ANYTHING if the SCRAM went off ? The defense should have to prove it was a mistake...
Lilo is so far in denial she would not know the truth if it hit her right between the eyes! It s always everyone elses fault..........time to start taking responsibility for your actions. Her parents need to do the same and stop being so damn co-dependent!
Shawn's looks of contempt directed at the DA are lethal. It's funny.....one Sheniqua doesn't like another. She learned her nasty **** at Johnny Cocoran's knee. Deal with it Chapman your client's going down!!!
@ 9. But that would severely jeopardize her parents ability to live off of her (almost gone) money... Don't you know the rules: It's okay to enable as long as you're getting something in return. Duh... LOL
Am I the only one who thinks that the prosecutor shouldn't have to prove ANYTHING if the SCRAM went off ? The defense should have to prove it was a mistake...
Posted at 9:17 AM on Jul 6, 2010 by KellyR
I totally agree KellyR.
Our state is in finacial trouble & more $$ going on this case, dragging it out ... The prosecuter has said from the beginning that she's going to get Lindsey... butttttttt when she failed to say it's at 'our' costs as tax payers of CA.... Something is very wrong with this picture when 'we' will end up for paying for it as taxpayers!
















