Controversial S#!T

Chrisean Rock ha escuchado fuerte y claro el mensaje de la gente, quien se ha enojado mucho con ella por su falta de cuidado al sostener a su bebé recién nacido. Pero dice que Blueface ha sido un total desaparecido cuando se trata de cuidarlo.

Chrisean abordó el video, ahora viral, que muestra la cabeza de su hijo pequeño moviéndose en el aire, mientras ella lo llevaba en un portabebés en Walmart. Rock admite su falta por no acunar su cabeza correctamente, pero dice que la mujer que la grabó lidiando con el bebé podría haber ofrecido su ayuda si sentía que había un problema.

Chrisean también criticó a Blueface, quien tiró un dardo a Chrisean después de que se viralizara el video- reclamando que las llamadas que le ha hecho no han sido contestadas. Rock explicó que estaba haciendo malabares con su perro y dos carritos llenos, y todo con sus propias manos. Asegura que estaba al límite.

Cardi B habló sobre días estresantes como este cuando le pedimos un consejo para Chrisean, tras su terrizaje forzoso en la maternidad. Ella le recordó que se reservara algo de tiempo libre para sí misma cuando las cosas se pusieran difíciles y viceversa.

Chrisean Rock has heard the message loud and clear from people angry with her lack of care when holding her newborn infant ... but says Blueface has been MIA in helping out with the newborn.

Chrisean addressed the now-viral video showing her young son's head dangling around while she held him in a carrier at Walmart. Rock admits fault for not cradling his head properly, but says the woman who recorded her struggling with the baby could've offered assistance if she felt there was a problem.

Chrisean also called out Blueface -- who took a jab at Chrisean after the video went viral --claiming her calls to him went unanswered. Rock explained she was juggling the baby, dog and 2 full carts with only 2 hands. Chrisean says she was stretched to the limit.

Blue, for his part, says he wasn't ragging on Chrisean over the Walmart but says she's going to have to play the part of the adult when he's not around to save the day.

Cardi B spoke on manic days like this when we asked her the best advice for Chrisean's crash landing into motherhood, where she reminded her to save some free time for herself when the going gets tough and vice versa.

Nick Cannon está de acuerdo con Charlamagne Tha God en que el marido de Nicki Minaj, Kenneth Petty, es malo para el negocio, es decir... para su negocio como artista.

Nick y sus compañeros de 'Daily Cannon' hablaron del asunto en su reciente emisión, con los panelistas diciendo que desde ahora en adelante se iban a referir a él, como el "Marido de Nicki Minaj", y nada más.

Petty está cumpliendo 120 días bajo arresto domiciliario por violar su libertad condicional como delincuente sexual registrado por hacer comentarios amenazantes a Offset en las redes sociales. Todo esto, en medio de la guerra fría entre Nicki y Cardi B.

CTG, recientemente etiquetó a Petty con "El burro del día" por deshonrar con sus actuaciones, incluso bromeando con que se le deben revocar sus privilegios de televisión mientras cumple su arresto domiciliario.

Mientras que Nicki aún no se ha referido a la defensa de su cónyuge. Más bien, ha estado defendiendo su propio nombre.

Nick Cannon agrees with Charlamagne Tha God's recent hot takes about Nicki Minaj's husband Kenneth Petty being bad for business ... meaning, her business as an artist.

Nick and his 'Daily Cannon' cohorts emptied the clip on their recent broadcast ... with one cohost even declaring Kenneth should officially be referred to as "Nicki Minaj's Husband" from this point forward.

Petty is currently serving 120 days house arrest for threatening Offset on social media amid Nicki and Cardi B's cold war -- a violation of his existing probation as a registered sex offender.

CTG recently tagged Petty with "Donkey Of The Day" dishonors over his street life act, and Nick said much the same ... even joking Petty should have his television privileges revoked while he serves his house arrest.

That might make for a testy household, and while Nicki hasn't come to her spouse's defense yet ... she's been defending her own name as she takes on her home's swatter.

Lizzo está enviando un mensaje muy claro, y es que ama y apoya a las "mujeres gordas negras", a quienes dio gran protagonismo mientras recibía un premio humanitario.

La cantante fue honrada el jueves por la noche con el Premio Humanitario de la Black Music Action Coalition y se rodeó de una veintena de mujeres de talla grande.

Como informamos, Lizzo ha sido recientemente objeto de dos demandas separadas, que la acusan de permitir el acoso racial, sexual y más en su gira. Aunque no hizo mención específica a las demandas, pronunció un discurso en el que sin duda se refería a ellas.

Lizzo prometió que seguiría amplificando las voces de las personas marginadas porque "tengo un micrófono y sé cómo usarlo". Y aseguró que, "seguirá representando y creando espacios seguros para las mujeres gordas negras, porque eso es lo que hago".

Lizzo fue demandada por una mujer el jueves, quien afirma que fue reclutada para hacer el vestuario de la gira de Lizzo de 2023.

En la demanda, ella dice que a las bailarinas de talla grande de Lizzo apenas se les dejaba espacio para cambiarse en los bastidores, y que a menudo se burlaban de ellas los hombres del equipo de escenario, quienes eran predominantemente blancos.

Un representante de la cantante llamó al abogado que presentó la demanda y lo avergonzó por "reclutar a alguien para presentar una falsa y absurda demanda publicitaria de quien, esperen a ver, en realidad nunca conoció ni habló con Lizzo. Le prestaremos toda la atención que se merece. Ninguna".

Lizzo is sending a very clear message -- she loves and supports "Black fat women" -- giving them a spotlight as she accepted a humanitarian award.

The singer was honored Thursday night with the Black Music Action Coalition's Humanitarian Award and surrounded herself with about 20 plus-sized women.

As we reported, Lizzo's recently been targeted in two separate lawsuits, accusing her of allowing racial harassment, sexual harassment and more on her tour. While she didn't specifically mention the lawsuits, Lizzo gave a speech that certainly addressed them.

Lizzo promised she'd continue to, "Amplify the voices of marginalized people because I have a microphone and I know how to use it." While stating she will, "Continue to put on and represent and create safe spaces for Black fat women, because that’s what the f**k I do."

Lizzo was sued Thursday by a woman who claims she was brought on to do wardrobe for Lizzo's tour in 2023.

In the lawsuit, the woman says Lizzo's plus-sized dancers were left with barely any room to change backstage, often made fun of by the predominantly white male stage crew.

A rep for the singer called the lawyer who filed the lawsuit and shamed them for, "recruiting someone to file a bogus, absurd publicity-stunt lawsuit who, wait for it, never actually met or even spoke with Lizzo. We will pay this as much attention as it deserves. None.”

After the award show, Lizzo attended dinner at West Hollywood hot spot, Craig's ... but she didn't address her comments any further on her way inside.

GoFundMe is putting a permanent kibosh on Rob Mercer, the World Series of Poker player who lied on the platform about having cancer, took tens of thousands of dollars in donations and then blew it in Vegas.

A spokesperson for GoFundMe tells TMZ ... those who chipped in for Rob's fundraiser earlier this year have been fully refunded, and he's been axed from using the site in the future.

We're told the company has zero tolerance for those who "exploit the generosity of our community," adding GoFundMe often cooperates with law enforcement investigations into those "formally accused of wrongdoing."

As we reported, Rob came clean this week about his big lie ... in which he created a GoFundMe to get enough cash to attend July's WSOP event in Las Vegas.

He claimed he had colon cancer and reportedly received between $30,000 and $50,000 from people supporting him. However, he told the Las Vegas Review-Journal, he made it all up, and claimed it was a "spur-of-the-moment" decision.

Rob also told the outlet he thinks he actually has undiagnosed breast cancer but was embarrassed to say that, which is why he says he picked colon cancer instead.

The issue he's facing now ... if he really does have breast cancer, he won't be able to jump on GoFundMe and ask for help.

GoFundMe está negando permanente el uso de su plataforma a Rob Mercer, el jugador de la Serie Mundial de Poker que mintió acerca de tener cáncer y se quedó con decenas de miles de dólares en donaciones para ir a gastarse todo a Las Vegas.

Un portavoz de GoFundMe le dijo a TMZ que las personas que contribuyeron a la recaudación de Rob a principios de este año ya han sido reembolsados completamente y a él se le ha prohibido volver a usar el sitio en el futuro.

Se nos dice que la empresa tiene tolerancia cero para aquellos que "explotan la generosidad de su comunidad", y añaden que GoFundMe a menudo coopera con las investigaciones policiales contra aquellos "acusados formalmente de malas acciones."

Como informamos, Rob se sinceró esta semana de su gran mentira, que consitió en crear un GoFundMe para recaudar dinero que le permitiera asistir al evento principal de la Serie Mundial de Póker, de julio en Las Vegas.

Para lograrlo, le dijo a la comunidad que tenía cáncer de colon y, al parecer, recibió entre 30.000 y 50.000 dólares en apoyo. Sin embargo, según declaró al Las Vegas Review-Journal, se lo inventó todo, lo que hoy describe como una decisión "improvisada".

Rob también le dijo al medio que cree que tiene cáncer de mama sin diagnosticar, pero que le daba vergüenza decirlo. Por eso prefirió decir cáncer de colon en su lugar.

El problema es que si ahora realmente tiene cáncer de mama, no será capaz de correr a GoFundMe y pedir ayuda.

Byron Scott won't be shedding any tears over "Winning Time: The Rise of the Lakers Dynasty" getting shelved anytime soon ... 'cause the Lakers champ tells TMZ Sports he wasn't tuning into the series anyway.

We caught up with Byron just days after HBO announced the fate of the show based on the 1980s Los Angeles Lakers after just two seasons ... and asked him if he was bummed the storyline never got the chance to shine a light on his tenure with the purple and gold.

Safe to say he's not losing any sleep over it ... 'cause Scott told us straight up, "Nah, I'm good."

"I wasn't a big fan of the show because I know a lot of it was fabricated in certain ways just to make it more interesting for the fans which is cool, that's TV. That's Hollywood. That's what they do."

Scott -- who won 3 NBA championships with the Lakers -- said he, Magic Johnson and his former teammates don't even discuss the show ... and if it's ever brought up, it's their wives doing the talking.

Of course, it's no surprise the real Showtime Lakers are saying "good riddance" to the series -- Magic, James Worthy and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar have all spoken out against it.

Byron -- who entered the picture (for real) in 1983 -- said he didn't feel as strongly about it as his teammates ... admitting he didn't care all that much.

Byron Scott no va a derramar ninguna lágrima por "Winning Time: The Rise of the Lakers Dynasty", serie de televisión que fue archivada en el corto plazo. Esto, porque el campeón de los Lakers le dice a TMZ Sports que no estaba sintonizando con ella, de todos modos.

Nos pusimos al día con Byron días después de que HBO anunciara el destino de la serie basada en Los Angeles Lakers en los años 1980, después de dos temporadas. Le preguntamos si estaba deprimido de que la historia no hubiera tenido oportunidad de brillar.

Podemos decir con seguridad que no es algo que le quite el sueño, porque solo nos dijo directamente: "Nah, estoy bien".

"Yo no era un gran fan de la serie porque sé que gran parte de ella fue hecha de cierta forma solo para hacerla más interesante para los fans, lo cual está bien, así es la televisión. Así es Hollywood. Eso es lo que hacen".

Scott, que ganó tres campeonatos de la NBA con los Lakers, dijo que él, Magic Johnson y sus ex compañeros de equipo ni siquiera hablaban de la serie y si alguna vez salió a colación fue porque sus esposas estaban hablando de ella.

Por supuesto, no es de extrañar que los verdaderos Lakers de Showtime digan "adiós" a la serie: Magic, James Worthy y Kareem Abdul-Jabbar se han manifestado en contra.

Byron Scott, que entró en escena (de verdad) en 1983 dijo que no se sentía tan mal al respecto como sus compañeros de equipo, y admitió que no le importaba mucho.

USC head coach Lincoln Riley has lifted the controversial ban he placed on journalist Luca Evans this week ... after the two had a "long conversation" about the Trojans' beef with the beat writer.

Riley and his team initially suspended the Orange County Register reporter after they said he violated their media policies when he documented the pre-press-conference mannerisms of a Trojans player in a recent article.

The school said Evans shouldn't have written about the student-athlete's actions ... explaining they happened outside of the Trojans' allotted media availability period. Riley then suspended Evans for two weeks in response.

But, following days of backlash, Riley agreed to talk with Evans on Wednesday ... and on Thursday, he decided to remove the punishment.

"We had a very candid and productive conversation," Riley said. "We agreed that we both could have handled the situation differently. I appreciate Luca recognizing the policies we have in place to protect our student-athletes and acknowledging to adhere to those in the future."

"We welcome Luca back to practice and look forward to his continuing coverage of the Trojans."

Added Evans, "I respect and understand the program's outlined policies regarding media access, and any missteps came through the intent of doing my job and pursuing relationship-building and storytelling."

"I will continue the same reporting an writing with fairness, accuracy and depth, and we reached an agreement to lift the restriction on access."

New mother Chrisean Rock is under attack again, this time for not properly holding her newborn son -- and, unsurprisingly, Blueface seems to be on the side of her critics.

The outrage came after a video surfaced Thursday of Chrisean shopping inside a Walmart while letting their son's head fall back as he slept in a forward baby carrier.

Many fans cited the dangers of having the infant's neck unsupported and also accused her of being too distracted to properly tend to the baby as she also walked her dog on its leash inside the store.

Blueface reacted to the wild moment as it trended on the app formerly known as Twitter ... assuring the people he was just as surprised as they were.

The two co-parents recently resolved their pre-birth issues and Chrisean has agreed to change the child's name from "Chrisean Jr." to "Jonathan Jr." -- Blueface's government name ... creating tension with his relationship with Jaidyn Alexis as a result.

La nueva madre Chrisean Rock está siendo atacada nuevamente, esta vez por no sostener adecuadamente a su hijo recién nacido y como era de esperar, Blueface parece estar del lado de sus críticos.

La indignación se produjo después de que el jueves saliera a la luz un video de Chrisean comprando en un Walmart mientras dejaba que la cabeza de su hijo se cayera hacia atrás mientras dormía en un coche.

Muchos fans comentaron sobre los peligros de dejar el cuello de los bebés sin un adecuado apoyo, y también la acusaron de estar demasiado distraída para atender adecuadamente a su hijo, mientras compraba y paseaba a su perro dentro de la tienda.

Blueface reaccionó al salvaje momento mientras era tendencia en la aplicación antes conocida como Twitter, asegurando a los usuarios que estaba tan sorprendido como ellos.

Los dos co-padres resolvieron recientemente sus problemas previos al nacimiento, y Chrisean ha acordado cambiar el nombre del niño de "Chrisean Jr." a "Jonathan Jr." -- en favor de Blueface, creando tensiones en su relación con Jaidyn Alexis como resultado.

Joe Jonas has fired back at Sophie Turner, saying Sophie is the one who has crossed the line, violating an order by a Florida judge by trying to take their kids permanently to England.

Joe's rep just issued a lengthy statement, in response to Sophie's claim Joe has "abducted" their kids by refusing to hand over their passports so they can return to England per their agreement.

Joe's response ... "After multiple conversations with Sophie, Joe initiated divorce proceedings in Florida, as Florida is the appropriate jurisdiction for the case. Sophie was aware that Joe was going to file for divorce. The Florida Court has already entered an order that restricts both parents from relocating the children. Sophie was served with this order on September 6, 2023, more than two weeks ago."

So, Joe is saying Sophie's position would squarely violate the Florida order keeping the kids where they are.

He also makes it clear ... although he believes the kids' home is in the United States, he's open to sharing custody with her, even if she moves permanently to England. "Joe is seeking shared parenting with the kids so that they are raised by both their mother and father, and is of course also okay with the kids being raised both in the U.S. and the UK. The children were born in the U.S. and have spent the vast majority of their lives in the U.S. They are American citizens."

Joe's rep says their team is surprised by Sophie's latest move ... "Joe and Sophie had a cordial meeting this past Sunday in New York, when Sophie came to New York to be with the kids. They have been with her since that meeting. Joe's impression of the meeting was that they had reached an understanding that they would work together towards an amicable co-parenting setup."

And then, the turn ... "Less than 24 hours later, Sophie advised that she wanted to take the children permanently to the UK. Thereafter, she demanded via this filing that Joe hand over the children’s passports so that she could take them out of the country immediately. If he complies, Joe will be in violation of the Florida Court order."

Joe also takes issue with the allegation he is effectively abducting the kids ... "This is an unfortunate legal disagreement about a marriage that is sadly ending. When language like "abduction" is used, it is misleading at best, and a serious abuse of the legal system at worst. The children were not abducted. After being in Joe's care for the past three months at the agreement of both parties, the children are currently with their mother. Sophie is making this claim only to move the divorce proceedings to the UK and to remove the children from the U.S. permanently."

The legal reality ... now that they are no longer a family living together, their deal is not binding on the divorce judge. The North Star for divorce judges is what is in the best interests of the children.

Do you think the Sophie Turner/Joe Jonas divorce war will get uglier? Vote below.

John Cusack -- someone who's been transparent about his liberal views for years -- is coming after Democrats ... 'cause in his eyes, they have a total lack of morals.

The often-left-wing actor didn't hold back on social media earlier this week, saying those towards the top of the Democratic Party are "full of s***." He goes on to blame them for people switching to Donald Trump as a consideration for the presidency.

It's a long rant that John goes on -- he even takes shots at former Prez Barack Obama's iconic "Hope and Change" slogan ... something John's calling, "another branded hustle."

John's heated talk came in response to an article that claimed Dems are considering doing away with federal wealth taxes ... writing, "This kind of staggering amoral bulls*** is one of the main reason[s] (yes there are others) Trump's demagoguery works on people."

He sarcastically adds, "Don’t worry fellas - the democrats will save the .000000001 % from paying tax" ... saying, "To even attempt this … Unbelievable."

For those unaware, John's often spoken out about things like politics, activism, and wealth distribution ... but he usually sees things from a Democratic perspective.

Joe Jonas le respondió a Sophie Turner, diciéndole que se ha pasado de la raya al intentar llevarse a sus hijas permanentemente a Inglaterra, ya que con ello estaría violando la orden de un juez de Florida.

El representante de Joe acaba de emitir un extenso comunicado, en respuesta a la afirmación de Sophie de que Joe ha "secuestrado" a sus hijas al negarse a entregar sus pasaportes para que puedan regresar a Inglaterra, según su acuerdo.

La respuesta de Joe dice: "Después de múltiples conversaciones con Sophie, Joe inició los trámites de divorcio en Florida, ya que Florida es la jurisdicción apropiada para el caso. Sophie era consciente de que Joe iba a solicitar el divorcio. El Tribunal de Florida ya ha dictado una orden que restringe a ambos progenitores el traslado de los niños. Sophie fue notificada de esta orden el 6 de septiembre de 2023, hace más de dos semanas".

Por lo tanto, Joe está diciendo que la posición de Sophie violaría de lleno la orden de Florida de mantener a los niños donde están.

También deja claro que, aunque cree que el hogar de los niños es en Estados Unidos, está abierto a compartir la custodia con ella, incluso si decide mudarse permanentemente a Inglaterra. "Joe está buscando la custodia compartida con las niñas para que sean criadas tanto por su madre como por su padre, y por supuesto también está de acuerdo con que las niñas sean criadas tanto en los EE.UU. como en el Reino Unido. Las niños nacieron en EE.UU. y han pasado la mayor parte de su vida en ese país. Son ciudadanas estadounidenses".

El representante de Joe dice que su equipo está sorprendido por el último movimiento de Sophie: "Joe y Sophie tuvieron un encuentro cordial el pasado domingo en Nueva York, cuando Sophie vino a la ciudad para estar con los niños. Ellos han estado con ella desde ese encuentro. La impresión de Joe de la reunión fue que habían llegado a un entendimiento de que trabajarían juntos para llegar a un acuerdo amistoso de coparentalidad."

Y luego, el giro: "Menos de 24 horas después, Sophie comunicó que quería llevarse a los niños permanentemente al Reino Unido. A partir de entonces, exigió a través de esta presentación que Joe le entregara los pasaportes de los niños para poder sacarlos del país inmediatamente. Si él cumple, Joe estaría violando la orden del Tribunal de Florida".

Joe también se opone a la alegación de que está secuestrando a los niños: "Este es un desafortunado desacuerdo legal sobre un matrimonio que tristemente está terminando. Cuando se utiliza un lenguaje como "secuestro", en el mejor de los casos es engañoso y, en el peor, un grave abuso del sistema legal. Las niñas no fueron secuestrados. Tras haber estado al cuidado de Joe durante los últimos tres meses por acuerdo de ambas partes, las niñas están actualmente con su madre. Sophie está haciendo este reclo solo para trasladar el proceso de divorcio a Reino Unido y sacar a los niños de EE.UU. de forma permanente."

Esa es la realidad legal ... ahora que ya no son una familia que vive junta, su acuerdo no es vinculante para el juez de divorcio. El norte para los jueces de divorcio es lo abogar por el mejor interés de los niños.